A Comparative Study of the Undergraduate Nursing Curriculum in Iran and at the University of Washington, USA

Background: The education and training of the next generation of nurses necessitate that undergraduate nursing programs keep pace with the ever-increasing global changes and emerging knowledge. Comparing educational systems, it is possible to enhance the academic credibility of educational programs, expand the horizons of nursing, and improve the quality of nursing care. Therefore, this study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis of the undergraduate nursing education programs in Iran and at the University of Washington, USA. Methods: This descriptive comparative study was conducted in four stages (description, interpretation, juxtaposition, and comparison) using the Brady model in 2022-2023. The necessary information for the undergraduate nursing program in Iran and Washington was obtained from the Ministry of Health, Treatment, and Medical Education website and the University of Washington website, respectively. Results: There were differences between the universities of Iran and Washington in terms of the elements of the undergraduate nursing curriculum, including philosophy, mission, vision, objectives, roles of graduates, conditions and methods of student admission, course characteristics and structure, educational program implementation strategies, and program evaluation methods. The most significant differences were in the duration of the program and the number and titles of the courses. Conclusion: Given the crucial role of nurses in providing health and medical services, it is recommended that revisions be made to the philosophy, mission, objectives, admission methods, and course units of this program. Additionally, clear guidelines regarding the evaluation of the program and student assessments should be provided to strengthen the strengths and address the weaknesses of the undergraduate nursing curriculum, thereby improving the quality of education for students in this field and, consequently, the quality of nursing care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Avicenna journal of Care and Health in Operating Room
Published
2025-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34172/ajchor.79
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health and Well-being Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of the Undergraduate Nursing Curriculum in Iran and at the University of Washington, USA

M Koosha, Seyed Reza Borzou, Tayebeh Hasan Tehrani
1 citations
Avicenna journal of Care and Health in Operating Room
Health and Well-being Studies
2.31
article

A Comparative Study of the Undergraduate Nursing Curriculum in Iran and at the University of Washington, USA

M Koosha, Seyed Reza Borzou, Tayebeh Hasan Tehrani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: The education and training of the next generation of nurses necessitate that undergraduate nursing programs keep pace with the ever-increasing global changes and emerging knowledge. Comparing educational systems, it is possible to enhance the academic credibility of educational programs, expand the horizons of nursing, and improve the quality of nursing care. Therefore, this study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis of the undergraduate nursing education programs in Iran and at the University of Washington, USA. Methods: This descriptive comparative study was conducted in four stages (description, interpretation, juxtaposition, and comparison) using the Brady model in 2022-2023. The necessary information for the undergraduate nursing program in Iran and Washington was obtained from the Ministry of Health, Treatment, and Medical Education website and the University of Washington website, respectively. Results: There were differences between the universities of Iran and Washington in terms of the elements of the undergraduate nursing curriculum, including philosophy, mission, vision, objectives, roles of graduates, conditions and methods of student admission, course characteristics and structure, educational program implementation strategies, and program evaluation methods. The most significant differences were in the duration of the program and the number and titles of the courses. Conclusion: Given the crucial role of nurses in providing health and medical services, it is recommended that revisions be made to the philosophy, mission, objectives, admission methods, and course units of this program. Additionally, clear guidelines regarding the evaluation of the program and student assessments should be provided to strengthen the strengths and address the weaknesses of the undergraduate nursing curriculum, thereby improving the quality of education for students in this field and, consequently, the quality of nursing care.

Avicenna journal of Care and Health in Operating RoomVol. 3(1)
Hamedan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamedan University of Medical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Health and Well-being Studies
2.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.