Development and validation of an LMOOC Quality Evaluation Scale: A large-scale mixed-method approach

Abstract Limited research has examined the quality of language MOOCs and no existing instrument has been developed to gauge learners’ evaluation of LMOOC quality. This study develops an LMOOC Quality Evaluation Scale (LQES) and validates it in the Chinese context, which has the largest number of LMOOC learners in the world. The data were collected from 2,315 LMOOC learners in China using a mixed-method approach. Development and validation of the scale involved (1) generation of an initial item pool based on a semi-structured interview and literature review, (2) refinement of scale items through consultation of LMOOC experts and a focus group interview, (3) exploration of the factor structure of the scale using exploratory factor analysis, and (4) validation and confirmation of the final scale using confirmatory factor analysis. A four-factor model, comprising Instructional Design, L2 Teachers’ Competence, Teaching Implementation, and Technical Support, emerged and was validated. The 26-item LQES provides an original and comprehensive framework for understanding the complexities of LMOOC quality. This study highlights the critical factors underpinning the evaluation of LMOOC quality and paves the way for further refining of the instrument in future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ReCALL
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0958344025000072
Primary Topic
Online Learning and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of an LMOOC Quality Evaluation Scale: A large-scale mixed-method approach

Rong Luo, Gaojun Shi, R. Huang
ReCALL
Online Learning and Analytics
article

Development and validation of an LMOOC Quality Evaluation Scale: A large-scale mixed-method approach

Rong Luo, Gaojun Shi, R. Huang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Limited research has examined the quality of language MOOCs and no existing instrument has been developed to gauge learners’ evaluation of LMOOC quality. This study develops an LMOOC Quality Evaluation Scale (LQES) and validates it in the Chinese context, which has the largest number of LMOOC learners in the world. The data were collected from 2,315 LMOOC learners in China using a mixed-method approach. Development and validation of the scale involved (1) generation of an initial item pool based on a semi-structured interview and literature review, (2) refinement of scale items through consultation of LMOOC experts and a focus group interview, (3) exploration of the factor structure of the scale using exploratory factor analysis, and (4) validation and confirmation of the final scale using confirmatory factor analysis. A four-factor model, comprising Instructional Design, L2 Teachers’ Competence, Teaching Implementation, and Technical Support, emerged and was validated. The 26-item LQES provides an original and comprehensive framework for understanding the complexities of LMOOC quality. This study highlights the critical factors underpinning the evaluation of LMOOC quality and paves the way for further refining of the instrument in future research.

ReCALLVol. 38(1)
Hangzhou Normal University (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Online Learning and Analytics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Development and validation of an LMOOC Quality Evaluation Scale: A large-scale mixed-method approach — Rong Luo, Gaojun Shi, et al. · ReCALL (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS