Double Up Food Bucks Heartland: A Qualitative Analysis of a Bi-State Nutrition Incentive Program for SNAP Participants

15.8 (AE 3.4) out of 49 points (range of scores from 8.3 to 28.3).The mean score was 5.9 AE 2.8 for healthy food groups out of 32, and 9.8 AE 1.8 for unhealthy food groups out of 17; higher scores indicate better diet quality for both groups.Low scores for healthy food groups were due to low intake of deep orange fruits, cruciferous vegetables and deep orange tubers, whereas higher scores for unhealthy food groups were due to low intake of processed meat and purchased deep-fried foods.No statistically significant association was reported between GDQS quartiles and having controlled hypertension (OR: 1.06, 95%CI: 0.77, 1.46,.Conclusions: To our knowledge, we are the first to report use of the GDQS in Peru.We found poor diet quality among Peruvian adults with hypertension, which was characterized by low intake of healthy food groups.Inferences are based on the GDQS distribution in our study participants and larger samples are needed to better understand the impact of diet quality on hypertension control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Developments in Nutrition
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdnut.2025.106337
Primary Topic
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Double Up Food Bucks Heartland: A Qualitative Analysis of a Bi-State Nutrition Incentive Program for SNAP Participants

Heather Valentine, Cheryl Gibson
Current Developments in Nutrition
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
article

Double Up Food Bucks Heartland: A Qualitative Analysis of a Bi-State Nutrition Incentive Program for SNAP Participants

Heather Valentine, Cheryl Gibson
article en

Abstract

15.8 (AE 3.4) out of 49 points (range of scores from 8.3 to 28.3).The mean score was 5.9 AE 2.8 for healthy food groups out of 32, and 9.8 AE 1.8 for unhealthy food groups out of 17; higher scores indicate better diet quality for both groups.Low scores for healthy food groups were due to low intake of deep orange fruits, cruciferous vegetables and deep orange tubers, whereas higher scores for unhealthy food groups were due to low intake of processed meat and purchased deep-fried foods.No statistically significant association was reported between GDQS quartiles and having controlled hypertension (OR: 1.06, 95%CI: 0.77, 1.46,.Conclusions: To our knowledge, we are the first to report use of the GDQS in Peru.We found poor diet quality among Peruvian adults with hypertension, which was characterized by low intake of healthy food groups.Inferences are based on the GDQS distribution in our study participants and larger samples are needed to better understand the impact of diet quality on hypertension control.

Current Developments in NutritionVol. 9
University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Fogarty International Center
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Double Up Food Bucks Heartland: A Qualitative Analysis of a Bi-State Nutrition Incentive Program for SNAP Participants — Heather Valentine, Cheryl Gibson · Current Developments in Nutrition (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS