Developments in Children's Evaluations of and Reasoning About Disability-Related Accommodations

Children with disabilities often receive accommodations, but teachers rarely explain them to typically-developing (TD) classmates. How do TD students reason about these accommodations and evaluate their fairness? Five-, seven-, and nine-year-olds from the United States (N = 122; 50% female; 87.7% white; data collected April 2022 - September 2023) heard stories where a child character with a cognitive or physical disability engaged with a cognitive or physical accommodation. Participants explained why the child engaged in the accommodation and evaluated the accommodation's fairness. Nine-year-olds judged accommodations to be significantly fairer than 5-year-olds. In their explanations, the oldest children mentioned characters' needs significantly more, whereas the youngest children mentioned characters' motives significantly more. Mentioning characters' needs predicted evaluating accommodations as fairer, and mentioning characters' motives predicted evaluating accommodations as less fair.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Child Development
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.14255
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developments in Children's Evaluations of and Reasoning About Disability-Related Accommodations

Jonathan D. Lane, Nicolette Granata, Chyna Bacchus, Melanie Leguizamon
1 citations
Child Development
Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
4.20
article

Developments in Children's Evaluations of and Reasoning About Disability-Related Accommodations

Jonathan D. Lane, Nicolette Granata, Chyna Bacchus, Melanie Leguizamon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Children with disabilities often receive accommodations, but teachers rarely explain them to typically-developing (TD) classmates. How do TD students reason about these accommodations and evaluate their fairness? Five-, seven-, and nine-year-olds from the United States (N = 122; 50% female; 87.7% white; data collected April 2022 - September 2023) heard stories where a child character with a cognitive or physical disability engaged with a cognitive or physical accommodation. Participants explained why the child engaged in the accommodation and evaluated the accommodation's fairness. Nine-year-olds judged accommodations to be significantly fairer than 5-year-olds. In their explanations, the oldest children mentioned characters' needs significantly more, whereas the youngest children mentioned characters' motives significantly more. Mentioning characters' needs predicted evaluating accommodations as fairer, and mentioning characters' motives predicted evaluating accommodations as less fair.

Child DevelopmentVol. 96(4)
Vanderbilt University (US), Vanderbilt Health (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Developments in Children's Evaluations of and Reasoning About Disability-Related Accommodations — Jonathan D. Lane, Nicolette Granata, et al. · Child Development (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS