Socioeconomic Status, Clinical Characteristics and Mortality in Two Subtypes of <scp>ALD</scp> According to the New <scp>SLD</scp> Classifications

ABSTRACT Under the new steatotic liver disease (SLD) framework, alcohol‐related liver disease (ALD) is defined including two subtypes: (1) people with cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRFs) and with alcohol consumption &gt; 50/60 g/day (for female/male), noted as ALD‐1, and (2) people with daily alcohol consumption &gt; 20/30 g/day but without CMRF, noted as ALD‐2. However, little is known about the difference between these subtypes. Using UK biobank data, we identified individuals with ALD‐1 and ALD‐2 using the standard definition. We compared the two groups on their socioeconomic status, clinical characteristics, and mortality. Among 11 583 participants with ALD, only 17 (0.15%) had ALD‐2. Compared to ALD‐1, those with ALD‐2 were more likely to be non‐White, socioeconomically deprived, and smokers, with higher levels of ALT, AST, GGT, and FIB4 scores. The mortality rate was significantly higher in ALD‐2 than ALD‐1 (31.9 vs. 11.3 per 1000 person‐years, HR 2.45 (95% CI 1.09, 5.50)). ALD‐1 and ALD‐2 exhibit substantial heterogeneity in socioeconomic status, lifestyle factors, clinical characteristics, and prognoses, suggesting distinct underlying mechanisms. These findings highlight the need for tailored management strategies that address the unique characteristics of each subtype.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Liver international communications.
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lci2.70019
Primary Topic
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socioeconomic Status, Clinical Characteristics and Mortality in Two Subtypes of ALD According to the New SLD Classifications

Chioma N. Izzi‐Engbeaya, Mark Woodward, Qi Feng, Pinelopi Manousou
Liver international communications.
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Socioeconomic Status, Clinical Characteristics and Mortality in Two Subtypes of ALD According to the New SLD Classifications

Chioma N. Izzi‐Engbeaya, Mark Woodward, Qi Feng, Pinelopi Manousou
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Under the new steatotic liver disease (SLD) framework, alcohol‐related liver disease (ALD) is defined including two subtypes: (1) people with cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRFs) and with alcohol consumption &gt; 50/60 g/day (for female/male), noted as ALD‐1, and (2) people with daily alcohol consumption &gt; 20/30 g/day but without CMRF, noted as ALD‐2. However, little is known about the difference between these subtypes. Using UK biobank data, we identified individuals with ALD‐1 and ALD‐2 using the standard definition. We compared the two groups on their socioeconomic status, clinical characteristics, and mortality. Among 11 583 participants with ALD, only 17 (0.15%) had ALD‐2. Compared to ALD‐1, those with ALD‐2 were more likely to be non‐White, socioeconomically deprived, and smokers, with higher levels of ALT, AST, GGT, and FIB4 scores. The mortality rate was significantly higher in ALD‐2 than ALD‐1 (31.9 vs. 11.3 per 1000 person‐years, HR 2.45 (95% CI 1.09, 5.50)). ALD‐1 and ALD‐2 exhibit substantial heterogeneity in socioeconomic status, lifestyle factors, clinical characteristics, and prognoses, suggesting distinct underlying mechanisms. These findings highlight the need for tailored management strategies that address the unique characteristics of each subtype.

Liver international communications.Vol. 6(2)
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), The George Institute for Global Health (GB), St Mary's Hospital (GB), The George Institute for Global Health (AU), St. Mary's Hospital (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Medical Research Council, NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.