Testing The Effects of Player Matching in Basketball Matches and Small-Sided Game Training Scenarios Based on The Relative Age Effect: A 6-Month Study on Physical Performance and Skill Adaptations

Identifying strategies to mitigate the impact of the Relative Age Effect (RAE) on the development of youth basketball players is crucial. This study aimed to compare two methods of player grouping during competitive small-sided games and match scenarios in training sessions, focusing on their impact on physical performance and technical skill development: mixed birthdate quartiles (CON) versus structured grouping based on birthdate quartiles (BG) over a 6-month period. A randomized controlled trial was conducted with forty-one youth basketball players (age: 12.9 ± 0.7 years) at a trained/developmental level. Throughout the study, participants in the BG group (n = 20) were assigned to small-sided games or match competition scenarios based on their birthdate quartiles, while those in the CON group (n = 21) were grouped with players from mixed quartiles. Players were evaluated at baseline and after the 6-month period for physical performance using countermovement jump (CMJ), change-of-direction (COD), and aerobic capacity (YYIRT). Additionally, they were assessed for technical skills in shooting, passing, and dribbling tests. Comparisons were made based on both birthdate quartiles (quartiles q1-2 relatively older, and q3-4 relatively younger players) and group. After 6 months, the CONq3q4 covered a shorter YYIRT distance than the CONq1q2 group (<i>p</i> = 0.040), achieved a lower CMJ height than both the CONq1q2 (<i>p</i> = 0.024) and BGq1q2 groups (<i>p</i> = 0.019), and had a greater COD deficit than the CONq1q2 group (<i>p</i> = 0.046). Additionally, the CONq3q4 group had longer dribbling times than the CONq1q2 (<i>p</i> = 0.002), BGq1q2 (<i>p</i> = 0.004), and BGq3q4 (<i>p</i> = 0.009) groups. In skill assessments, the CONq3q4 group scored lower in passing than both the CONq1q2 (<i>p</i> = 0.015) and BGq1q2 groups (<i>p</i> = 0.025), and scored lower in shooting compared to the CONq1q2 (<i>p</i> = 0.019), BGq1q2 (<i>p</i> = 0.003), and BGq3q4 (<i>p</i> = 0.003) groups. Grouping youth basketball players based on birthdate quartiles during training can mitigate the relative age effect, promoting more equitable physical and technical development by reducing age-related biases. However, these conclusions are limited by the study's duration and require further research over the long term.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2025.397
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Testing The Effects of Player Matching in Basketball Matches and Small-Sided Game Training Scenarios Based on The Relative Age Effect: A 6-Month Study on Physical Performance and Skill Adaptations

LiXin Wei, MingBang Li, Yafei Zheng, S. Dai
1 citations
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
article

Testing The Effects of Player Matching in Basketball Matches and Small-Sided Game Training Scenarios Based on The Relative Age Effect: A 6-Month Study on Physical Performance and Skill Adaptations

LiXin Wei, MingBang Li, Yafei Zheng, S. Dai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Identifying strategies to mitigate the impact of the Relative Age Effect (RAE) on the development of youth basketball players is crucial. This study aimed to compare two methods of player grouping during competitive small-sided games and match scenarios in training sessions, focusing on their impact on physical performance and technical skill development: mixed birthdate quartiles (CON) versus structured grouping based on birthdate quartiles (BG) over a 6-month period. A randomized controlled trial was conducted with forty-one youth basketball players (age: 12.9 ± 0.7 years) at a trained/developmental level. Throughout the study, participants in the BG group (n = 20) were assigned to small-sided games or match competition scenarios based on their birthdate quartiles, while those in the CON group (n = 21) were grouped with players from mixed quartiles. Players were evaluated at baseline and after the 6-month period for physical performance using countermovement jump (CMJ), change-of-direction (COD), and aerobic capacity (YYIRT). Additionally, they were assessed for technical skills in shooting, passing, and dribbling tests. Comparisons were made based on both birthdate quartiles (quartiles q1-2 relatively older, and q3-4 relatively younger players) and group. After 6 months, the CONq3q4 covered a shorter YYIRT distance than the CONq1q2 group (<i>p</i> = 0.040), achieved a lower CMJ height than both the CONq1q2 (<i>p</i> = 0.024) and BGq1q2 groups (<i>p</i> = 0.019), and had a greater COD deficit than the CONq1q2 group (<i>p</i> = 0.046). Additionally, the CONq3q4 group had longer dribbling times than the CONq1q2 (<i>p</i> = 0.002), BGq1q2 (<i>p</i> = 0.004), and BGq3q4 (<i>p</i> = 0.009) groups. In skill assessments, the CONq3q4 group scored lower in passing than both the CONq1q2 (<i>p</i> = 0.015) and BGq1q2 groups (<i>p</i> = 0.025), and scored lower in shooting compared to the CONq1q2 (<i>p</i> = 0.019), BGq1q2 (<i>p</i> = 0.003), and BGq3q4 (<i>p</i> = 0.003) groups. Grouping youth basketball players based on birthdate quartiles during training can mitigate the relative age effect, promoting more equitable physical and technical development by reducing age-related biases. However, these conclusions are limited by the study's duration and require further research over the long term.

Journal of Sports Science and MedicineVol. 24(2)
Sichuan University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Sports Performance and Training
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.