Ammonium Organosulfonates as Machine Learning-Driven “Crystallization Cocktails” for the Structure Determination of Liquid Molecules

A concept of “crystallization cocktails” for crystal structure determination of small (liquid) molecules is introduced, offering a simple one-step procedure of one-pot mixing commercial sulfonic acids (such as p-toluenesulfonic and 1,5-naphtalenedisulfonic) and geometrically diverse amines (such as p-phenylenediamine, 4,4′-oxidianiline, and 4,4′-diamino-3,3′-dichlorodiphenylmethane) in different combinations to cocrystallize with a chosen liquid compound by simple solvent evaporation. These “crystallization cocktails” may adapt to different guests owing to “labile” intermolecular interactions between sulfonate and ammonium ions of diverse geometries and flexibility, as demonstrated by a successful cocrystallization of three model phenol derivatives (2,4-dimethyl-, 2-isopropyl-, and 2-ethylphenol); one of them being characterized by X-ray diffraction for the first time. The guest-to-host ratio in the obtained cocrystals, three of which featured the same ammonium organosulfonate but different phenol guests, was found to depend on the size of the individual components of the “crystallization cocktails”. To get insight into the preferable formation of a cocrystal by some of these “cocktails”─as common (descriptive) crystallographic tools failed to provide a definitive answer─a machine learning (ML) algorithm was developed, which allowed limiting the list of their components to a few most suitable ones for a successful cocrystallization with liquid phenols. “Crystallization cocktails” that can be “mixed to order”─and boosted by the ML─pave the way toward routine structure determination of liquids or other poorly crystallizing substances by X-ray diffraction, streamlining the search for new chemical compounds and identification of “old” ones in natural products, waste and natural waters, and living organisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crystal Growth & Design
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.5c00498
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Molecular spectroscopy and chirality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ammonium Organosulfonates as Machine Learning-Driven “Crystallization Cocktails” for the Structure Determination of Liquid Molecules

Anastasia A. Danshina, Ivan Zlobin, Yulia Vladimirovna Nelyubina, С. Е. Соловьева et al.
1 citations
Crystal Growth & Design
Molecular spectroscopy and chirality
0.76
article

Ammonium Organosulfonates as Machine Learning-Driven “Crystallization Cocktails” for the Structure Determination of Liquid Molecules

Anastasia A. Danshina, Ivan Zlobin, Yulia Vladimirovna Nelyubina, С. Е. Соловьева, Nikolai Rekut
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A concept of “crystallization cocktails” for crystal structure determination of small (liquid) molecules is introduced, offering a simple one-step procedure of one-pot mixing commercial sulfonic acids (such as p-toluenesulfonic and 1,5-naphtalenedisulfonic) and geometrically diverse amines (such as p-phenylenediamine, 4,4′-oxidianiline, and 4,4′-diamino-3,3′-dichlorodiphenylmethane) in different combinations to cocrystallize with a chosen liquid compound by simple solvent evaporation. These “crystallization cocktails” may adapt to different guests owing to “labile” intermolecular interactions between sulfonate and ammonium ions of diverse geometries and flexibility, as demonstrated by a successful cocrystallization of three model phenol derivatives (2,4-dimethyl-, 2-isopropyl-, and 2-ethylphenol); one of them being characterized by X-ray diffraction for the first time. The guest-to-host ratio in the obtained cocrystals, three of which featured the same ammonium organosulfonate but different phenol guests, was found to depend on the size of the individual components of the “crystallization cocktails”. To get insight into the preferable formation of a cocrystal by some of these “cocktails”─as common (descriptive) crystallographic tools failed to provide a definitive answer─a machine learning (ML) algorithm was developed, which allowed limiting the list of their components to a few most suitable ones for a successful cocrystallization with liquid phenols. “Crystallization cocktails” that can be “mixed to order”─and boosted by the ML─pave the way toward routine structure determination of liquids or other poorly crystallizing substances by X-ray diffraction, streamlining the search for new chemical compounds and identification of “old” ones in natural products, waste and natural waters, and living organisms.

Crystal Growth & DesignVol. 25(12)
A. N. Nesmeyanov Institute of Organoelement Compounds (RU), Institute of Problems of Chemical Physics (RU)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Molecular spectroscopy and chirality
0.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.