Ultra-Processed Food Intake, Other Dietary Risk Behaviors and Depression in Korean Adults

compared to examine thematic overlaps, differences, and keyword associations.Results: A total of 13,175 eligible publications were identified.Research output increased steadily over the study period, with The International Journal of Eating Disorders contributing the largest volume of publications.Key topics included a focus on human populations, covering specific disorders, psychological factors, behaviors, physical characteristics, and methodologies.Six clusters of MeSH terms were categorized and visualized using a word cloud, highlighting thematic groups.A weak-to-moderate correlation was observed between AAS and CCPY (r 2 0.34), reflecting different drivers of public and academic engagement.The AAS list emphasized socially relevant and timely topics, while the CCPY list prioritized foundational, methodologically robust studies.Conclusions: This study highlights the complementary roles of public and academic metrics in evaluating research impact.Aligning research priorities with dissemination strategies can enhance societal relevance, foster interdisciplinary collaboration, and advance prevention, treatment, and management of eating disorders.