Evaluation of the effects of head movement-related artifacts on the quality of cone-beam computed tomography images

Introduction: Motion artifacts in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) can impact image quality significantly.The study assessed the influence of artifacts resulting from various head movements on the precision of distance measurement and CBCT image quality.Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of artifacts caused by different head movements on CBCT images.Material and methods: In this experimental trial, a human skull was placed on a robot, and different movements, including posterior, anterior, rotational, and tremor motions were simulated.CBCT devices, Cranex 3D (three-dimensional) and Carestream were employed.For images' analysis, artifacts were classified as streak, double-contour, ring, and blurred.To determine measurement accuracy, acrylic markers were placed at buccal and lingual aspects of the alveolar crest on posterior and anterior areas.Distance between the markers was measured on the skull and images using a caliper and OnDemand3D software, respectively.Measurements were repeated twice by two observers within a twoweek interval.Data analysis was done using descriptive statistics methods, i.e., Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results:The occurrence of streak artifacts was consistent between the two devices, while blurred images were slightly more prevalent in Carestream.Notably, significant differences were observed between the experimental and software measurements in Cranex 3D images of the anterior mandible and posterior maxilla.Conclusions: Among the motions simulated, the posterior movement of 10 mm had the most pronounced negative impact on image quality, while the rotational movement of 5 presented the least effect.Interestingly, the rotational movement reduced measurement accuracy more than other types of movements in both the Carestream and Cranex 3D devices.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Stomatology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5114/jos.2025.151577
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the effects of head movement-related artifacts on the quality of cone-beam computed tomography images

Rasool Baghbani, Maryam Farhadian, Fatemeh Salemi, Marjan Mostafapoor et al.
Journal of Stomatology
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
article

Evaluation of the effects of head movement-related artifacts on the quality of cone-beam computed tomography images

Rasool Baghbani, Maryam Farhadian, Fatemeh Salemi, Marjan Mostafapoor, Maryam Foroozandeh, Touradj Ebrahimi, Masoomeh Ashoorirad
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Motion artifacts in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) can impact image quality significantly.The study assessed the influence of artifacts resulting from various head movements on the precision of distance measurement and CBCT image quality.Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of artifacts caused by different head movements on CBCT images.Material and methods: In this experimental trial, a human skull was placed on a robot, and different movements, including posterior, anterior, rotational, and tremor motions were simulated.CBCT devices, Cranex 3D (three-dimensional) and Carestream were employed.For images' analysis, artifacts were classified as streak, double-contour, ring, and blurred.To determine measurement accuracy, acrylic markers were placed at buccal and lingual aspects of the alveolar crest on posterior and anterior areas.Distance between the markers was measured on the skull and images using a caliper and OnDemand3D software, respectively.Measurements were repeated twice by two observers within a twoweek interval.Data analysis was done using descriptive statistics methods, i.e., Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results:The occurrence of streak artifacts was consistent between the two devices, while blurred images were slightly more prevalent in Carestream.Notably, significant differences were observed between the experimental and software measurements in Cranex 3D images of the anterior mandible and posterior maxilla.Conclusions: Among the motions simulated, the posterior movement of 10 mm had the most pronounced negative impact on image quality, while the rotational movement of 5 presented the least effect.Interestingly, the rotational movement reduced measurement accuracy more than other types of movements in both the Carestream and Cranex 3D devices.

Journal of StomatologyVol. 78(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.