Anaerobic Digestion of the Liquid Fraction of Fruit and Vegetable Waste: Two-Stage versus Single-Stage Process

This study evaluated the anaerobic digestion of the liquid fraction of fruit and vegetable waste to optimize energy recovery through sequential hydrogen and methane production. Two configurations were tested: a single-stage (SS) system using an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor and a two-stage (TS) system combining an anaerobic structured bed reactor (AnStBR) with a UASB reactor. The objective was to identify the most efficient configuration under various organic loading rates (OLR). In the AnStBR, OLR ranged from 40 to 80 g COD/L<sub>reactor</sub>·day, while in UASB reactors, the OLR range was from 1.5 to 22.0 g COD/L<sub>reactor</sub>·day. The TS outperformed the SS in methane production, achieving 3.6 NL CH<sub>4</sub>/L<sub>reactor</sub>·day at an OLR of 22.0 g of COD/L<sub>reactor</sub>·day. It also demonstrated a higher energy potential, generating a total of 1554.9 KJ/day35.7% more efficient than the SS. Additionally, the UASB-TS reactor maintained stability throughout the study, with minimal acid accumulation and an intermediate alkalinity/partial alkalinity ratio (IA:PA) consistently below 0.4, even at elevated OLR. In contrast, the UASB-SS reactor showed signs of acidification at higher OLR. These findings suggest that TS anaerobic digestion offers a more robust and efficient solution for treating high-strength organic waste, enhancing both energy recovery and process stability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Omega
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c00073
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anaerobic Digestion of the Liquid Fraction of Fruit and Vegetable Waste: Two-Stage versus Single-Stage Process

André Bezerra dos Santos, Francisco das Chagas Gomes da Silva Júnior, Priscilla de Souza Almeida, Maíra Saldanha Duarte et al.
1 citations
ACS Omega
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
1.01
article

Anaerobic Digestion of the Liquid Fraction of Fruit and Vegetable Waste: Two-Stage versus Single-Stage Process

André Bezerra dos Santos, Francisco das Chagas Gomes da Silva Júnior, Priscilla de Souza Almeida, Maíra Saldanha Duarte, Renato Carrhá Leitão, Marcelo Zaiat, Thobias Pereira Silva, Camila Aparecida de Menezes
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study evaluated the anaerobic digestion of the liquid fraction of fruit and vegetable waste to optimize energy recovery through sequential hydrogen and methane production. Two configurations were tested: a single-stage (SS) system using an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor and a two-stage (TS) system combining an anaerobic structured bed reactor (AnStBR) with a UASB reactor. The objective was to identify the most efficient configuration under various organic loading rates (OLR). In the AnStBR, OLR ranged from 40 to 80 g COD/L<sub>reactor</sub>·day, while in UASB reactors, the OLR range was from 1.5 to 22.0 g COD/L<sub>reactor</sub>·day. The TS outperformed the SS in methane production, achieving 3.6 NL CH<sub>4</sub>/L<sub>reactor</sub>·day at an OLR of 22.0 g of COD/L<sub>reactor</sub>·day. It also demonstrated a higher energy potential, generating a total of 1554.9 KJ/day35.7% more efficient than the SS. Additionally, the UASB-TS reactor maintained stability throughout the study, with minimal acid accumulation and an intermediate alkalinity/partial alkalinity ratio (IA:PA) consistently below 0.4, even at elevated OLR. In contrast, the UASB-SS reactor showed signs of acidification at higher OLR. These findings suggest that TS anaerobic digestion offers a more robust and efficient solution for treating high-strength organic waste, enhancing both energy recovery and process stability.

ACS OmegaVol. 10(22)
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (BR), Universidade Federal do Ceará (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
1.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.