Comparison of Alternative Engine Architectures for Next Generation Supersonic Aircraft
The present paper illustrates the design space exploration of a supersonic mixed-flow turbofan engine for civil applications. The aircraft platform selected is a 10-passenger business jet, cruising at Mach 1.6. To overcome noise limitations at take-off, an alternative engine architecture with additional exhaust nozzle variability, to overcome the take-off noise limit, is proposed. The fully variable area nozzle configuration allows for an overall 15% weight reduction against a partially variable area nozzle architecture. In terms of overall aircraft mission fuel burn, it shows an 8% mission fuel burn reduction against the partially variable area nozzle architecture, with a final fuel efficiency of 11.4 pax-mile/us gallon.
Authors
- Christos Mourouzidis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3482-2956)
- Dario Del Gatto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8388-5307)
- Stylianos Adamidis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9087-5403)
- Stephen Brown
Institutions
- University of Bedfordshire (GB)
Publication Details
- Published
- 2025-05-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025090115
- Primary Topic
- Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- European Commission