Brain activity and motor performance under different focus of attention in shooting of elite archer

The correlation between different focuses of attention (FOAs) and performance in archery had been insufficiently explored. This study aimed to investigate brain activity under different FOAs, quantify the relationship between FOA and arrow scores in shooting. Sixteen elite archers were recruited to participate in this study. A 48-channel portable fNIRS device was used to collect hemodynamic signals in an outdoor environment. Each archer shot five arrows at a target placed 70 meters away. The results showed that motor performance at external and internal focus are not reach the statistical difference (t = 0.527, p = .606, Cohen’s d = 0.117). compared to IF, EF have lesser ΔHbO in channel 14 (t = -2.218, p = .044, Cohen’s d = 0.640), channel 30 (t = -2.306, p = .042, Cohen’s d = 0.598) and channel 42 (t = -3.506, p = .005, Cohen’s d = 1.012), but have greater ΔHbO in channel 37 (t = 2.638, p = .023, Cohen’s d = 0.762), channel 38 (t = 2.631, p = .023, Cohen’s d = 0.759). Additionally, compared to IF, EF have greater neural efficiency in channel 28 (p = .026). Compared to IF, EF enhanced activity in the visual cortex, particularly in V2 and V3, while decreasing activity in M1, S1, PMC, and SMA. Additionally, EF demonstrated greater neural efficiency in PMC and SMA. However, under IF, archers allocated additional resources to PMC and SMA to maintain performance levels comparable to those under EF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55860/2nq43911
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brain activity and motor performance under different focus of attention in shooting of elite archer

Shuo Wang, Juan Wu, Kun Qin
2 citations
Journal of Human Sport and Exercise
Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies
1.35
article

Brain activity and motor performance under different focus of attention in shooting of elite archer

Shuo Wang, Juan Wu, Kun Qin
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The correlation between different focuses of attention (FOAs) and performance in archery had been insufficiently explored. This study aimed to investigate brain activity under different FOAs, quantify the relationship between FOA and arrow scores in shooting. Sixteen elite archers were recruited to participate in this study. A 48-channel portable fNIRS device was used to collect hemodynamic signals in an outdoor environment. Each archer shot five arrows at a target placed 70 meters away. The results showed that motor performance at external and internal focus are not reach the statistical difference (t = 0.527, p = .606, Cohen’s d = 0.117). compared to IF, EF have lesser ΔHbO in channel 14 (t = -2.218, p = .044, Cohen’s d = 0.640), channel 30 (t = -2.306, p = .042, Cohen’s d = 0.598) and channel 42 (t = -3.506, p = .005, Cohen’s d = 1.012), but have greater ΔHbO in channel 37 (t = 2.638, p = .023, Cohen’s d = 0.762), channel 38 (t = 2.631, p = .023, Cohen’s d = 0.759). Additionally, compared to IF, EF have greater neural efficiency in channel 28 (p = .026). Compared to IF, EF enhanced activity in the visual cortex, particularly in V2 and V3, while decreasing activity in M1, S1, PMC, and SMA. Additionally, EF demonstrated greater neural efficiency in PMC and SMA. However, under IF, archers allocated additional resources to PMC and SMA to maintain performance levels comparable to those under EF.

Journal of Human Sport and ExerciseVol. 20(3)
Kunsan National University (KR), Qufu Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.