Evaluating Genetic Obesity Interventions: A Survival Analysis Approach

Background: Obesity, particularly when influenced by genetic factors, poses significant challenges for effective weight management. Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy of three medications—Metformin, Ozempic (semaglutide), and Saxenda (liraglutide)—in promoting weight reduction. Methods: A total of 165 participants were included in the study, with 70.9% classified as obese. Participants were treated with Metformin, Ozempic, or Saxenda, and their weight loss outcomes were monitored. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess time-to-weight reduction, and Cox regression analysis was employed to identify predictors of weight loss. Results: GLP-1 receptor agonists (Ozempic and Saxenda) demonstrated significantly greater weight reduction compared to metformin (p<0.001). Mean weight loss was 8.72 kg for Ozempic and 9.81 kg for Saxenda, compared to only 1.17–1.18 kg for Metformin. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that participants on Ozempic and Saxenda achieved weight reduction faster than those on Metformin (p<0.001). Cox regression analysis identified physical activity as the only significant predictor of weight reduction (HR = 1.64, p=0.006), while age, diet, and smoking status were not statistically significant. Conclusions: GLP-1 receptor agonists (Ozempic and Saxenda) are highly effective for weight reduction in individuals with obesity, particularly those with genetic predispositions, and should be considered as first-line treatments. Physical activity plays a critical role in enhancing weight loss outcomes and should be integrated into obesity management plans.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Al-Rafidain Journal of Medical Sciences ( ISSN 2789-3219 )
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54133/ajms.v8i2.1926
Primary Topic
Diet and metabolism studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Genetic Obesity Interventions: A Survival Analysis Approach

Shatha Zaidan
Al-Rafidain Journal of Medical Sciences ( ISSN 2789-3219 )
Diet and metabolism studies
article

Evaluating Genetic Obesity Interventions: A Survival Analysis Approach

Shatha Zaidan
article en

Abstract

Background: Obesity, particularly when influenced by genetic factors, poses significant challenges for effective weight management. Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy of three medications—Metformin, Ozempic (semaglutide), and Saxenda (liraglutide)—in promoting weight reduction. Methods: A total of 165 participants were included in the study, with 70.9% classified as obese. Participants were treated with Metformin, Ozempic, or Saxenda, and their weight loss outcomes were monitored. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to assess time-to-weight reduction, and Cox regression analysis was employed to identify predictors of weight loss. Results: GLP-1 receptor agonists (Ozempic and Saxenda) demonstrated significantly greater weight reduction compared to metformin (p<0.001). Mean weight loss was 8.72 kg for Ozempic and 9.81 kg for Saxenda, compared to only 1.17–1.18 kg for Metformin. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that participants on Ozempic and Saxenda achieved weight reduction faster than those on Metformin (p<0.001). Cox regression analysis identified physical activity as the only significant predictor of weight reduction (HR = 1.64, p=0.006), while age, diet, and smoking status were not statistically significant. Conclusions: GLP-1 receptor agonists (Ozempic and Saxenda) are highly effective for weight reduction in individuals with obesity, particularly those with genetic predispositions, and should be considered as first-line treatments. Physical activity plays a critical role in enhancing weight loss outcomes and should be integrated into obesity management plans.

Al-Rafidain Journal of Medical Sciences ( ISSN 2789-3219 )Vol. 8(2)
University of Baghdad (IQ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Diet and metabolism studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.