States and Markets: David Marquand's Contribution to Political Economy

Abstract David Marquand was professor of politics at Sheffield from 1991–1996. He contributed greatly to the department's growth and reputation, particularly through his successful directorship of the Political Economy Research Centre (PERC) which was established in 1993. David became interested in political economy because he wanted to understand what had made the golden age of the Keynesian welfare state possible, why it had collapsed and whether a new collective social project was possible. He argued that the familiar opposition between markets and states was false. States needed markets, markets needed states and there was more than one model of capitalism. Every successful political economy was based on a moral economy which underpinned the public realm and was reflected in the choices of citizens. In later writings he became pre‐occupied with the consequences of the return of untamed capitalism and the rise of a new plutocracy, how they might be resisted and the public realm restored.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Political Quarterly
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923x.13543
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

States and Markets: David Marquand's Contribution to Political Economy

Andrew Gamble
The Political Quarterly
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
article

States and Markets: David Marquand's Contribution to Political Economy

Andrew Gamble
article en

Abstract

Abstract David Marquand was professor of politics at Sheffield from 1991–1996. He contributed greatly to the department's growth and reputation, particularly through his successful directorship of the Political Economy Research Centre (PERC) which was established in 1993. David became interested in political economy because he wanted to understand what had made the golden age of the Keynesian welfare state possible, why it had collapsed and whether a new collective social project was possible. He argued that the familiar opposition between markets and states was false. States needed markets, markets needed states and there was more than one model of capitalism. Every successful political economy was based on a moral economy which underpinned the public realm and was reflected in the choices of citizens. In later writings he became pre‐occupied with the consequences of the return of untamed capitalism and the rise of a new plutocracy, how they might be resisted and the public realm restored.

The Political QuarterlyVol. 96(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.