From decision aiding to the massive use of algorithms: where does the responsibility stand?

In the very large debates on ethics of algorithms, this paper proposes an analysis on human responsibility. On the one hand, algorithms are designed by some humans, who bear a part of responsibility in the results and unexpected impacts. Nevertheless, we show how the fact they cannot embrace the full situations of use and consequences leads to an unreachable limit. On the other hand, using technology is never free of responsibility, even if there also exist limits to characterise. Massive uses by unprofessional users introduce additional questions that modify the possibilities to be ethically responsible. The article is structured in such a way as to show how the limits have gradually evolved, leaving unthought of issues and a failure to share responsibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AI and Ethics
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-025-00753-1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From decision aiding to the massive use of algorithms: where does the responsibility stand?

Nadia Brauner, Odile Bellenguez‐Morineau, Alexis Tsoukiàs
AI and Ethics
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

From decision aiding to the massive use of algorithms: where does the responsibility stand?

Nadia Brauner, Odile Bellenguez‐Morineau, Alexis Tsoukiàs
article en

Abstract

In the very large debates on ethics of algorithms, this paper proposes an analysis on human responsibility. On the one hand, algorithms are designed by some humans, who bear a part of responsibility in the results and unexpected impacts. Nevertheless, we show how the fact they cannot embrace the full situations of use and consequences leads to an unreachable limit. On the other hand, using technology is never free of responsibility, even if there also exist limits to characterise. Massive uses by unprofessional users introduce additional questions that modify the possibilities to be ethically responsible. The article is structured in such a way as to show how the limits have gradually evolved, leaving unthought of issues and a failure to share responsibility.

AI and EthicsVol. 5(5)
Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Laboratoire des Sciences pour la Conception, l'Optimisation et la Production (FR), Laboratoire des Sciences du Numérique de Nantes (FR), IMT Atlantique (FR), Université Paris Dauphine-PSL (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR), Nantes Université (FR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.