EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT UNITS AND PLACEMENT METHODS ON WAVE OVERTOPPING ON MOUND BREAKWATERS

Most of the existing and widely used wave run-up and overtopping formulas reflect the effect of different units placed at the armor layers of mound breakwaters utilizing a roughness coefficient (f) specifically assigned for the unit type (see e.g. TAW, 2002; EurOtop, 2018). However, the effect of the different armor placement methods has not been fully addressed in these approaches. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the effects of different placement methods and packing densities of different armor units on wave overtopping. Within this scope, an experimental study was carried out using quarry rocks, tetrapod and Antifer units along the armor layer of conventional mound breakwater cross-sections having two different face slopes. In the experiments, both the mean overtopping discharges (q) and individual overtopping volumes (Vind) were measured. The experimental results are compared with the computations based on the most prevalent formulas in practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Coastal Engineering Proceedings
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9753/icce.v38.structures.87
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT UNITS AND PLACEMENT METHODS ON WAVE OVERTOPPING ON MOUND BREAKWATERS

Baris Ufuk Senturk, Fuat Demir, Cüneyt Baykal, Hasan Gökhan Güler et al.
Coastal Engineering Proceedings
Coastal and Marine Dynamics
article

EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT UNITS AND PLACEMENT METHODS ON WAVE OVERTOPPING ON MOUND BREAKWATERS

Baris Ufuk Senturk, Fuat Demir, Cüneyt Baykal, Hasan Gökhan Güler, Ahmet Cevdet Yalçıner, Gülizar Özyurt Tarakcıoğlu, Dogan Kisacik, İ. Guler, Ayşen Ergin, Alperen Mulayim Korkmaz, Berkay Erler
article en

Abstract

Most of the existing and widely used wave run-up and overtopping formulas reflect the effect of different units placed at the armor layers of mound breakwaters utilizing a roughness coefficient (f) specifically assigned for the unit type (see e.g. TAW, 2002; EurOtop, 2018). However, the effect of the different armor placement methods has not been fully addressed in these approaches. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the effects of different placement methods and packing densities of different armor units on wave overtopping. Within this scope, an experimental study was carried out using quarry rocks, tetrapod and Antifer units along the armor layer of conventional mound breakwater cross-sections having two different face slopes. In the experiments, both the mean overtopping discharges (q) and individual overtopping volumes (Vind) were measured. The experimental results are compared with the computations based on the most prevalent formulas in practice.

Coastal Engineering Proceedings(38)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Coastal and Marine Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.