Limitations of the Farquhar–von Caemmerer–Berry Model in Estimating the Maximum Electron Transport Rate: Evidence from Four C3 Species

The study evaluates the accuracy of two FvCB model sub-models (I and II) in estimating the maximum electron transport rate for CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation (<i>J</i><sub>A-max</sub>) by comparing estimated values with observed maximum electron transport rates (<i>J</i><sub>f-max</sub>) in four C<sub>3</sub> species: <i>Triticum aestivum</i> L., <i>Silphium perfoliatum</i> L., <i>Lolium perenne</i> L., and <i>Trifolium pratense</i> L. Significant discrepancies were found between <i>J</i><sub>A-max</sub> estimates from sub-model I and observed <i>J</i><sub>f-max</sub> values for <i>T. aestivum</i>, <i>S. perfoliatum</i>, and <i>T. pratense</i> (<i>p</i> < 0.05), with sub-model I overestimating <i>J</i><sub>A-max</sub> for <i>T. aestivum</i>. Sub-model II consistently produced higher <i>J</i><sub>A-max</sub> estimates than sub-model I. This study highlights limitations in the FvCB sub-models, particularly their tendency to overestimate <i>J</i><sub>A-max</sub> when accounting for electron consumption by photorespiration (<i>J</i><sub>O</sub>), nitrate reduction (<i>J</i><sub>Nit</sub>), and the Mehler reaction (<i>J</i><sub>MAP</sub>). An alternative empirical model provided more accurate <i>J</i><sub>f-max</sub> estimates, suggesting the need for improved approaches to model photosynthetic electron transport. These findings have important implications for crop yield prediction, ecological modeling, and climate change adaptation strategies, emphasizing the need for more accurate estimation methods in plant physiology research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biology
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biology14060630
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.23

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Limitations of the Farquhar–von Caemmerer–Berry Model in Estimating the Maximum Electron Transport Rate: Evidence from Four C3 Species

Piotr Robakowski, Zi‐Piao Ye, Xiaolong Yang, Shuangxi Zhou et al.
5 citations
Biology
Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
6.23
article

Limitations of the Farquhar–von Caemmerer–Berry Model in Estimating the Maximum Electron Transport Rate: Evidence from Four C3 Species

Piotr Robakowski, Zi‐Piao Ye, Xiaolong Yang, Shuangxi Zhou, Fubiao Wang, Wenhai Hu, Hua-Jing Kang, Yian Xiao, Ting An
article en
5 citations

Abstract

The study evaluates the accuracy of two FvCB model sub-models (I and II) in estimating the maximum electron transport rate for CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation (<i>J</i><sub>A-max</sub>) by comparing estimated values with observed maximum electron transport rates (<i>J</i><sub>f-max</sub>) in four C<sub>3</sub> species: <i>Triticum aestivum</i> L., <i>Silphium perfoliatum</i> L., <i>Lolium perenne</i> L., and <i>Trifolium pratense</i> L. Significant discrepancies were found between <i>J</i><sub>A-max</sub> estimates from sub-model I and observed <i>J</i><sub>f-max</sub> values for <i>T. aestivum</i>, <i>S. perfoliatum</i>, and <i>T. pratense</i> (<i>p</i> < 0.05), with sub-model I overestimating <i>J</i><sub>A-max</sub> for <i>T. aestivum</i>. Sub-model II consistently produced higher <i>J</i><sub>A-max</sub> estimates than sub-model I. This study highlights limitations in the FvCB sub-models, particularly their tendency to overestimate <i>J</i><sub>A-max</sub> when accounting for electron consumption by photorespiration (<i>J</i><sub>O</sub>), nitrate reduction (<i>J</i><sub>Nit</sub>), and the Mehler reaction (<i>J</i><sub>MAP</sub>). An alternative empirical model provided more accurate <i>J</i><sub>f-max</sub> estimates, suggesting the need for improved approaches to model photosynthetic electron transport. These findings have important implications for crop yield prediction, ecological modeling, and climate change adaptation strategies, emphasizing the need for more accurate estimation methods in plant physiology research.

BiologyVol. 14(6)
Jinggangshan University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Nantong University (CN), ZheJiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN), Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences (CN), University of Life Sciences in Poznań (PL), Jiangxi Agricultural University (CN), Macquarie University (AU)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
6.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.