Identity and positionality in composing graphic narratives: reflective lessons on lingering with rhetorical choices

Purpose By studying how English Language Arts preservice teachers (PSTs) talk about composing graphic narratives featuring identities they do/don’t share, this paper aims to investigate how their identities and positionalities came to bear on writing choices. Design/methodology/approach Authors engage theories of identity and positionality to analyze how eight PSTs negotiated topics of their graphic narratives and rationalized rhetorical approaches to storytelling. Qualitative data includes in-process, reflective planning videos, video transcriptions and fieldnotes. Findings PSTs who wrote about identities they share critiqued an underrepresentation of their identities in literature, leveraging mentor texts and graphic composition to write themselves into existence. PSTs who wrote about identities they do not share considered the ethics of telling another’s story, leaning on research and critical reflection to uplift underrepresented narratives. Practical implications Teacher educators’ approaches to teaching narrative writing may be supported by asking PSTs to linger with in-process, critical reflection, by building into instructional design opportunities for lingering, particularly around complex topics like identity and equity and by leveraging multimodal composition to support PSTs’ learning about identities. Originality/value The study extends scholarly work on in-process reflection while composing about voice and identity. Authors suggest generative outcomes for encouraging PSTs to consider their identities and positionalities, specifically when composing graphic narratives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
English Teaching Practice & Critique
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-03-2025-0038
Primary Topic
Literacy, Media, and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identity and positionality in composing graphic narratives: reflective lessons on lingering with rhetorical choices

Taylor Rose-Dougherty, James S. Chisholm, Mike P. Cook
English Teaching Practice & Critique
Literacy, Media, and Education
article

Identity and positionality in composing graphic narratives: reflective lessons on lingering with rhetorical choices

Taylor Rose-Dougherty, James S. Chisholm, Mike P. Cook
article en

Abstract

Purpose By studying how English Language Arts preservice teachers (PSTs) talk about composing graphic narratives featuring identities they do/don’t share, this paper aims to investigate how their identities and positionalities came to bear on writing choices. Design/methodology/approach Authors engage theories of identity and positionality to analyze how eight PSTs negotiated topics of their graphic narratives and rationalized rhetorical approaches to storytelling. Qualitative data includes in-process, reflective planning videos, video transcriptions and fieldnotes. Findings PSTs who wrote about identities they share critiqued an underrepresentation of their identities in literature, leveraging mentor texts and graphic composition to write themselves into existence. PSTs who wrote about identities they do not share considered the ethics of telling another’s story, leaning on research and critical reflection to uplift underrepresented narratives. Practical implications Teacher educators’ approaches to teaching narrative writing may be supported by asking PSTs to linger with in-process, critical reflection, by building into instructional design opportunities for lingering, particularly around complex topics like identity and equity and by leveraging multimodal composition to support PSTs’ learning about identities. Originality/value The study extends scholarly work on in-process reflection while composing about voice and identity. Authors suggest generative outcomes for encouraging PSTs to consider their identities and positionalities, specifically when composing graphic narratives.

English Teaching Practice & CritiqueVol. 24(4)
Utah State University (US), University of Louisville (US), Auburn University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Literacy, Media, and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.