eHealth literacy and cancer screening attitudes among chronic patients

The present study attempts to uncover eHealth literacy and cancer screening attitudes among chronic patients receiving inpatient treatment. We collected the data of this cross-sectional study from 300 chronic patients face-to-face between August 1 and November 30, 2023. Participants were administered a demographic information form, the e-Health Literacy Scale, and the Attitude Scale for Cancer Screening. We analyzed the data using independent samples t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and simple linear regression analysis. Our findings showed that only one-fifth of participants were knowledgeable about cancer screening programs. The most prevalent facilitating and hindering factors of getting screened for cancer were found to be professional healthcare guidance and lack of knowledge, respectively. Participants had a mean score of 14.17 ± 10.29 on the e-Health Literacy Scale and 89.66 ± 20.86 on the Attitude Scale for Cancer Screening. Moreover, we found that the greater the eHealth literacy, the more positive participants' attitudes toward cancer screening. Finally, 6.4% of the variance in the cancer screening attitudes was explained by eHealth literacy (p < 0.05). Insufficient eHealth literacy and cancer screening attitudes among chronic patients, particularly those receiving inpatient treatment, are likely to lead patients to remain incognizant of their elevated risks and unable to cooperate with their physicians. Our findings imply designing multidisciplinary initiatives to boost e-health literacy among chronic patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-03595-3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.82
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

eHealth literacy and cancer screening attitudes among chronic patients

Züleyha Kılıç, Çiğdem Samancı Tekin
1 citations
Scientific Reports
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
2.82
article

eHealth literacy and cancer screening attitudes among chronic patients

Züleyha Kılıç, Çiğdem Samancı Tekin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The present study attempts to uncover eHealth literacy and cancer screening attitudes among chronic patients receiving inpatient treatment. We collected the data of this cross-sectional study from 300 chronic patients face-to-face between August 1 and November 30, 2023. Participants were administered a demographic information form, the e-Health Literacy Scale, and the Attitude Scale for Cancer Screening. We analyzed the data using independent samples t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and simple linear regression analysis. Our findings showed that only one-fifth of participants were knowledgeable about cancer screening programs. The most prevalent facilitating and hindering factors of getting screened for cancer were found to be professional healthcare guidance and lack of knowledge, respectively. Participants had a mean score of 14.17 ± 10.29 on the e-Health Literacy Scale and 89.66 ± 20.86 on the Attitude Scale for Cancer Screening. Moreover, we found that the greater the eHealth literacy, the more positive participants' attitudes toward cancer screening. Finally, 6.4% of the variance in the cancer screening attitudes was explained by eHealth literacy (p < 0.05). Insufficient eHealth literacy and cancer screening attitudes among chronic patients, particularly those receiving inpatient treatment, are likely to lead patients to remain incognizant of their elevated risks and unable to cooperate with their physicians. Our findings imply designing multidisciplinary initiatives to boost e-health literacy among chronic patients.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi (TR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
2.82
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.