Natural Gas Hydrate Transportability: Laboratory Testing Methods and Their Translation to a Field Flow Assurance Strategy

This paper provides a state-of-the-art review of natural gas hydrate transportability, best practice, and a detailed case history of field-driven laboratory testing that utilized common methods and compared how they each differently evaluated transportability. It is well-known that a conservative approach has historically been taken to the management of gas hydrate operating philosophies, especially when correlating laboratory testing to the field. This concept will be discussed in detail and compared to the real situation today where operators across the Gulf of Mexico are pushing hydrate management boundaries. This approach has required the development of more detailed test methods to quantifiably interrogate hydrate transportability. Rocking cells tests conducted to evaluate the relationship of water cut to hydrate transportability showed failures at just 10 vol % water cut. Application of 2 vol % anti-agglomerant (AA) was not able to control hydrate deposition. Autoclave testing showed failures at 15 vol % water cut, and application of 1 vol % AA was able to prevent hydrates from agglomerating sufficiently to form a detectable deposit. Rheometer testing showed the formation of solid hydrate plugs at 50 vol % water cut, while at ≤15 vol %, it showed much lower torque responses. Despite low torques, the test protocol revealed evidence of hydrate bedding, both before and after shut-in. Performance testing at different concentrations of chemical showed both positive and negative interactions and enabled a more definitive assessment of the hydrate phenomena. Addition of 1 vol % AA appeared to make conditions worse, while 2 vol % resulted in perfect control of hydrate deposition. In summary, the three methods provide three different assessments of hydrate formation and deposition risk and efficacy of chemical control. A new rheometric method was presented that provided additional insights on the transportability of hydrates, enabling a better lab to field correlation and overall risk management of hydrate flow assurance risk.