STUDY THE EFFECTS OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE ON THE RECOVERY PROFILE IN SUBJECTS UNDERGOING ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY USING GENERAL ANAESTHESIA

Background: Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) requires hemodynamic stability and minimal bleeding for optimal outcomes. Dexmedetomidine, a selective 2-adrenergic agonist, may help by providing sedation, analgesia, and hypotension without respiratory depression, yet its role in recovery profiles remains under-evaluated. Objectives: To assess the effects of dexmedetomidine on the recovery profile, hemodynamic stability, emergence agitation, and postoperative pain in patients undergoing FESS under general anaesthesia. Methodology: This observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center from January 2023 to December 2024. Sixty adult patients undergoing FESS under general anaesthesia were randomized into two groups: Group A (control) and Group B (dexmedetomidine). Group B received 0.5 µg/kg dexmedetomidine post-intubation. Hemodynamic parameters, emergence time, agitation, postoperative pain (VAS), and complications were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS with t-tests and Chi-square tests, considering p < 0.05 as significant. Results:Baseline demographic and physiological parameters were comparable between groups. Group B (dexmedetomidine) showed significantly lower heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, MAP, respiratory rate, and EtCO2 during emergence (p < 0.001). SPO2 remained similar in both groups. Emergence agitation was significantly lower in Group B (23.3%) versus Group A (83.3%) (p < 0.001). Mean VAS scores were significantly lower in Group B, indicating better postoperative pain control (p < 0.001). Postoperative adverse events like nausea, vomiting, and shivering were fewer in Group B, though drowsiness and hypotension were slightly higher. No significant respiratory depression or desaturation was noted in either group. Recovery times were not prolonged by dexmedetomidine. The drug provided better hemodynamic stability and smoother recovery without major side effects. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine effectively stabilizes intraoperative hemodynamics, reduces postoperative pain and agitation, and improves recovery profile without prolonging recovery or causing significant adverse events, making it a safe and valuable adjunct in FESS under general anaesthesia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PARIPEX INDIAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36106/gjra/3700712
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

STUDY THE EFFECTS OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE ON THE RECOVERY PROFILE IN SUBJECTS UNDERGOING ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY USING GENERAL ANAESTHESIA

Sapan S. Desai, P. Pisal, Pradeep Shivaji Raut, Rahul Jadhav
PARIPEX INDIAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

STUDY THE EFFECTS OF DEXMEDETOMIDINE ON THE RECOVERY PROFILE IN SUBJECTS UNDERGOING ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY USING GENERAL ANAESTHESIA

Sapan S. Desai, P. Pisal, Pradeep Shivaji Raut, Rahul Jadhav
article en

Abstract

Background: Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) requires hemodynamic stability and minimal bleeding for optimal outcomes. Dexmedetomidine, a selective 2-adrenergic agonist, may help by providing sedation, analgesia, and hypotension without respiratory depression, yet its role in recovery profiles remains under-evaluated. Objectives: To assess the effects of dexmedetomidine on the recovery profile, hemodynamic stability, emergence agitation, and postoperative pain in patients undergoing FESS under general anaesthesia. Methodology: This observational study was conducted at a tertiary care center from January 2023 to December 2024. Sixty adult patients undergoing FESS under general anaesthesia were randomized into two groups: Group A (control) and Group B (dexmedetomidine). Group B received 0.5 µg/kg dexmedetomidine post-intubation. Hemodynamic parameters, emergence time, agitation, postoperative pain (VAS), and complications were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS with t-tests and Chi-square tests, considering p < 0.05 as significant. Results:Baseline demographic and physiological parameters were comparable between groups. Group B (dexmedetomidine) showed significantly lower heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, MAP, respiratory rate, and EtCO2 during emergence (p < 0.001). SPO2 remained similar in both groups. Emergence agitation was significantly lower in Group B (23.3%) versus Group A (83.3%) (p < 0.001). Mean VAS scores were significantly lower in Group B, indicating better postoperative pain control (p < 0.001). Postoperative adverse events like nausea, vomiting, and shivering were fewer in Group B, though drowsiness and hypotension were slightly higher. No significant respiratory depression or desaturation was noted in either group. Recovery times were not prolonged by dexmedetomidine. The drug provided better hemodynamic stability and smoother recovery without major side effects. Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine effectively stabilizes intraoperative hemodynamics, reduces postoperative pain and agitation, and improves recovery profile without prolonging recovery or causing significant adverse events, making it a safe and valuable adjunct in FESS under general anaesthesia.

PARIPEX INDIAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH
Rajarshee Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj Government Medical College and CPR Hospital Kolhapur (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.