Impact of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation on Patients with Heart Failure Reduced Ejection Fraction and Preserved Ejection Fraction

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is expected to surpass that of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), yet it remains under-researched. Compared to HFrEF, patients with HFpEF have similarly poor survival rates, physical impairments, and quality of life (QOL) and similar improvements following exercise training. However, Medicare currently excludes coverage for cardiopulmonary rehabilitation (CR) for HFpEF. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of HF at baseline and the effects of CR in both subtypes. <b>Methods</b>: Ninety-nine patients (forty-three with HFrEF and fifty-six with HFpEF) who completed CR were included. Demographic data and outcome measures were assessed pre- and post-CR, including weight, body mass index (BMI), 5x-sit-to-stand (5xStS), timed-up-and-go (TUG), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life (F&P QOL), waist circumference, BERG balance, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Independent and paired t-tests were performed with statistical significance set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. <b>Results</b>: At baseline, compared to patients with HFrEF, patients with HFpEF were older with a significantly lower 6MWT distance (350.6 m vs. 299.6 m), lower BERG balance scores (52/56 vs. 49/56, respectively), and a 5xSTS score indicating a fall risk (16.9 ± 6.5). Following CR, both groups had significant improvements in all functional and self-reported outcome measures (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with no significant differences between HF subtypes. Patients with HFpEF also had a significant improvement in waist circumference. <b>Conclusions</b>: Compared to patients with HFrEF, patients with HFpEF presented with similar or greater impairments and had similar or greater improvements following CR. These results underscore the effectiveness of CR for HFpEF management and the need for insurance coverage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113815
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation on Patients with Heart Failure Reduced Ejection Fraction and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Sabine Gempel, Lawrence P. Cahalin, Taylor Wright, Jenna Kologie et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
2.78
article

Impact of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation on Patients with Heart Failure Reduced Ejection Fraction and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Sabine Gempel, Lawrence P. Cahalin, Taylor Wright, Jenna Kologie, Destini Decinti
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The prevalence of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is expected to surpass that of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), yet it remains under-researched. Compared to HFrEF, patients with HFpEF have similarly poor survival rates, physical impairments, and quality of life (QOL) and similar improvements following exercise training. However, Medicare currently excludes coverage for cardiopulmonary rehabilitation (CR) for HFpEF. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of HF at baseline and the effects of CR in both subtypes. <b>Methods</b>: Ninety-nine patients (forty-three with HFrEF and fifty-six with HFpEF) who completed CR were included. Demographic data and outcome measures were assessed pre- and post-CR, including weight, body mass index (BMI), 5x-sit-to-stand (5xStS), timed-up-and-go (TUG), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), Ferrans and Powers Quality of Life (F&P QOL), waist circumference, BERG balance, and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Independent and paired t-tests were performed with statistical significance set at <i>p</i> < 0.05. <b>Results</b>: At baseline, compared to patients with HFrEF, patients with HFpEF were older with a significantly lower 6MWT distance (350.6 m vs. 299.6 m), lower BERG balance scores (52/56 vs. 49/56, respectively), and a 5xSTS score indicating a fall risk (16.9 ± 6.5). Following CR, both groups had significant improvements in all functional and self-reported outcome measures (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with no significant differences between HF subtypes. Patients with HFpEF also had a significant improvement in waist circumference. <b>Conclusions</b>: Compared to patients with HFrEF, patients with HFpEF presented with similar or greater impairments and had similar or greater improvements following CR. These results underscore the effectiveness of CR for HFpEF management and the need for insurance coverage.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(11)
University of Miami (US), University of Miami Hospital (US)
University of Miami
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.