Control or Empowerment: Toward a Research Agenda on the Duality of Algorithmic Management

ABSTRACT Online labor platforms employ intelligent algorithmic technologies for work processes and rules, enabling algorithmic management of gig workers. Despite a growing body of research on algorithmic management, the field lacks tools to capture worker experiences, hindering empirical investigations into its subsequent impact mechanisms. This study introduces the Perceived Algorithmic Management Questionnaire, developed and validated through deep interviews and grounded theoretical analysis, to confirm the concept of algorithmic management duality. Drawing on the job demands–resources theory, we argue that the four dimensions of algorithm management both constrain and enable worker work engagement, resulting from workers' efforts to maintain autonomy and cope with deprivation caused by algorithm management. Overall, these findings shed light on the dual nature of algorithmic management, setting the stage for further exploration of its effects on worker behavior.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.70016
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Control or Empowerment: Toward a Research Agenda on the Duality of Algorithmic Management

Jianwu Jiang, Shuling Li, Jieyu Hu
5 citations
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
21.01
article

Control or Empowerment: Toward a Research Agenda on the Duality of Algorithmic Management

Jianwu Jiang, Shuling Li, Jieyu Hu
article en
5 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Online labor platforms employ intelligent algorithmic technologies for work processes and rules, enabling algorithmic management of gig workers. Despite a growing body of research on algorithmic management, the field lacks tools to capture worker experiences, hindering empirical investigations into its subsequent impact mechanisms. This study introduces the Perceived Algorithmic Management Questionnaire, developed and validated through deep interviews and grounded theoretical analysis, to confirm the concept of algorithmic management duality. Drawing on the job demands–resources theory, we argue that the four dimensions of algorithm management both constrain and enable worker work engagement, resulting from workers' efforts to maintain autonomy and cope with deprivation caused by algorithm management. Overall, these findings shed light on the dual nature of algorithmic management, setting the stage for further exploration of its effects on worker behavior.

Asia Pacific Journal of Human ResourcesVol. 63(3)
Shenzhen University (CN), Nanjing University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
21.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.