EU climate policy in turbulent times: understanding the response to the Covid-19 pandemic and Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine

Early studies of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine on EU climate policy have found that the crises reinforced EU climate policy. We go beyond these analyses by investigating key drivers underlying the EU's climate policy responses and their dynamics. This enables us to, first, better understand how the responses emerged and, second, explore the circumstances under which EU climate policy development may remain resilient under evolving crisis circumstances. We explore four factors: Commission climate policy entrepreneurship, the East-West climate policy divide among Member States, economic assets and interest groups, and the climate movement. We find that the crises enabled a side-lining of the East-West divisions while offering an opportunity for the Commission to promote its flagship European Green Deal. However, the further development of the four factors suggests that conditions for EU climate policymaking have deteriorated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Politics
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2025.2510063
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Global Energy Security and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EU climate policy in turbulent times: understanding the response to the Covid-19 pandemic and Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine

Claire Dupont, Ingmar von Homeyer, Sebastian Oberthür
2 citations
Environmental Politics
Global Energy Security and Policy
3.58
article

EU climate policy in turbulent times: understanding the response to the Covid-19 pandemic and Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine

Claire Dupont, Ingmar von Homeyer, Sebastian Oberthür
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Early studies of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine on EU climate policy have found that the crises reinforced EU climate policy. We go beyond these analyses by investigating key drivers underlying the EU's climate policy responses and their dynamics. This enables us to, first, better understand how the responses emerged and, second, explore the circumstances under which EU climate policy development may remain resilient under evolving crisis circumstances. We explore four factors: Commission climate policy entrepreneurship, the East-West climate policy divide among Member States, economic assets and interest groups, and the climate movement. We find that the crises enabled a side-lining of the East-West divisions while offering an opportunity for the Commission to promote its flagship European Green Deal. However, the further development of the four factors suggests that conditions for EU climate policymaking have deteriorated.

Environmental PoliticsVol. 34(7)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), University of Eastern Finland (FI), Ghent University Hospital (BE), Ghent University (BE), Finland University (FI), Dublin City University (IE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global Energy Security and Policy
3.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

EU climate policy in turbulent times: understanding the response to the Covid-19 pandemic and Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine — Claire Dupont, Ingmar von Homeyer, et al. · Environmental Politics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS