Constitutive scientific generative agent (CSGA): Leveraging large language models for automated constitutive model discovery

Abstract Data-driven approaches for constitutive modeling enable rapid, automated generation of models that predict a material’s mechanical response under load. Integrating theoretical knowledge into these approaches, which are then called grey-box approaches, can improve sample efficiency, extrapolation capability, and interpretability, albeit typically at the cost of experts required to use them. Recently, general-purpose large language model (LLM)-based scientific discovery methods have emerged as user-friendly approaches to scientific discovery. In this work, we compare two representatives of these paradigms: highly specialized constitutive artificial neural networks (CANNs) and the general LLM-based scientific generative agent (SGA) to evaluate current LLM capabilities in constitutive modeling. In addition, we introduce the constitutive scientific generative agent (CSGA) to combine both approaches’ strengths by enriching the SGA’s prompts with domain-specific data and materials theory. We compare CANN, SGA, and CSGA on three benchmark problems by assessing their accuracy in predicting stress responses under prescribed strain conditions. While our results show that CANNs remain the most accurate approach overall, the CSGA significantly outperforms the SGA and demonstrates the promise of specialized LLM-based methods for constitutive modeling. Moreover, the CSGA’s intuitive plain text interface and the full interpretability of the generated constitutive models make it a practical, accessible complement to existing approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Machine learning for computational science and engineering
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44379-025-00022-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Elasticity and Material Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constitutive scientific generative agent (CSGA): Leveraging large language models for automated constitutive model discovery

Roland Can Aydin, M. Busch, Christian Johannes Cyron, Kian P. Abdolazizi et al.
1 citations
Machine learning for computational science and engineering
Elasticity and Material Modeling
0.67
article

Constitutive scientific generative agent (CSGA): Leveraging large language models for automated constitutive model discovery

Roland Can Aydin, M. Busch, Christian Johannes Cyron, Kian P. Abdolazizi, Kevin Linka, M. Tacke, Kartik Bali
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Data-driven approaches for constitutive modeling enable rapid, automated generation of models that predict a material’s mechanical response under load. Integrating theoretical knowledge into these approaches, which are then called grey-box approaches, can improve sample efficiency, extrapolation capability, and interpretability, albeit typically at the cost of experts required to use them. Recently, general-purpose large language model (LLM)-based scientific discovery methods have emerged as user-friendly approaches to scientific discovery. In this work, we compare two representatives of these paradigms: highly specialized constitutive artificial neural networks (CANNs) and the general LLM-based scientific generative agent (SGA) to evaluate current LLM capabilities in constitutive modeling. In addition, we introduce the constitutive scientific generative agent (CSGA) to combine both approaches’ strengths by enriching the SGA’s prompts with domain-specific data and materials theory. We compare CANN, SGA, and CSGA on three benchmark problems by assessing their accuracy in predicting stress responses under prescribed strain conditions. While our results show that CANNs remain the most accurate approach overall, the CSGA significantly outperforms the SGA and demonstrates the promise of specialized LLM-based methods for constitutive modeling. Moreover, the CSGA’s intuitive plain text interface and the full interpretability of the generated constitutive models make it a practical, accessible complement to existing approaches.

Machine learning for computational science and engineeringVol. 1(1)
Universität Hamburg (DE), Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon (DE), Hamburg University of Technology (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Elasticity and Material Modeling
0.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.