Suppressing Rebellion, Projectıng Authority: The 1895–1896 Druze Uprisings and Abdulhamid II’s Resistance to British Influence

Unfortunately, studies on the period 1894-1896 of the Ottoman Empire emphasise the Armenian issue, which overshadows the effects of Sultan Abdülhamid II’s policies outside Anatolia. The Sultan was worn out due to the Armenian incidents that took place during these years and was subjected to intense pressure, especially from Britain. The sailing of the British navy close to the Ottoman ports posed a constant threat, while these pressures and threats created uneasiness among the Muslim population in Syria and caused the spread of Anglophobia. The Druze in Syria, who believed they were under the protection of Britain, were encouraged by this attitude and attempted to revolt. Despite the risk of foreign intervention, the Sultan authorised military action and suppressed the rebellions in a short time. This study analyses the causes and suppression of the Druze uprisings based on British consular reports, comparatively evaluates the Ottoman and British attitudes, and reveals that the Sultan’s swift and decisive intervention in Syria not only prevented foreign intervention, but also strengthened his legitimacy as Caliph over Muslims. Moreover, the study emphasises that the Sultan did not only focus on Anatolia but also pursued a strategic policy of resistance against British influence throughout the empire.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
İçtimaiyat
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33709/ictimaiyat.1625989
Primary Topic
Historical Turkish Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Suppressing Rebellion, Projectıng Authority: The 1895–1896 Druze Uprisings and Abdulhamid II’s Resistance to British Influence

Serdar Bay
İçtimaiyat
Historical Turkish Studies
article

Suppressing Rebellion, Projectıng Authority: The 1895–1896 Druze Uprisings and Abdulhamid II’s Resistance to British Influence

Serdar Bay
article en

Abstract

Unfortunately, studies on the period 1894-1896 of the Ottoman Empire emphasise the Armenian issue, which overshadows the effects of Sultan Abdülhamid II’s policies outside Anatolia. The Sultan was worn out due to the Armenian incidents that took place during these years and was subjected to intense pressure, especially from Britain. The sailing of the British navy close to the Ottoman ports posed a constant threat, while these pressures and threats created uneasiness among the Muslim population in Syria and caused the spread of Anglophobia. The Druze in Syria, who believed they were under the protection of Britain, were encouraged by this attitude and attempted to revolt. Despite the risk of foreign intervention, the Sultan authorised military action and suppressed the rebellions in a short time. This study analyses the causes and suppression of the Druze uprisings based on British consular reports, comparatively evaluates the Ottoman and British attitudes, and reveals that the Sultan’s swift and decisive intervention in Syria not only prevented foreign intervention, but also strengthened his legitimacy as Caliph over Muslims. Moreover, the study emphasises that the Sultan did not only focus on Anatolia but also pursued a strategic policy of resistance against British influence throughout the empire.

İçtimaiyatVol. 9(1)
Kafkas University (TR)
Anadolu Üniversitesi
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Historical Turkish Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.