Advancements in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Paradigm Shift

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has revolutionized the treatment landscape for colorectal cancer, offering patients a range of options that prioritize precision, faster recovery, and improved functional outcomes.As surgical techniques continue to evolve, methods such as laparoscopic surgery, robotic-assisted surgery, transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME), and natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) are becoming increasingly integrated into clinical practice.This editorial explores these innovative techniques, their advantages, and the ongoing discussions surrounding their long-term effectiveness in terms of tumor prognosis, highlighting the paradigm shift that MIS represents in the management of colorectal cancer.Laparoscopic surgery has been foundational in minimally invasive approaches.Key studies have confirmed its safety and efficacy compared to traditional open surgery.For example, the MRC CLASICC trial found no significant differences in circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity or complication rates between laparoscopic and open methods, although laparoscopic anterior rectal resection had a higher CRM positive rate.Long-term outcomes, including five-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), showed no significant differences, suggesting laparoscopic techniques can achieve similar oncological results.However, debates persist regarding their long-term implications [1].The COLOR series [2] and COREAN [3] studies echoed these findings, noting benefits like reduced bleeding and faster recovery, while studies such as ALaCaRT [4] and ACOSOG Z6051 [5] raised concerns about CRM negative rates and mesorectal integrity, indicating that laparoscopic surgery may not always be non-inferior to open surgery.Robotic-assisted surgery offers significant advancements in treating ultra-low rectal cancer, addressing challenges posed by traditional laparoscopic techniques.It provides improved dexterity and visualization essential

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31557/apjcp.2025.26.5.1479
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancements in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Paradigm Shift

Samira Soleymani, Hossein Neámatzadeh, Ahmad Shirinzadeh-Dastgiri, Amirhossein Rahmani et al.
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Advancements in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Paradigm Shift

Samira Soleymani, Hossein Neámatzadeh, Ahmad Shirinzadeh-Dastgiri, Amirhossein Rahmani, Amirhosein Naseri, Mehdi Khosravi-Mashizi
article en

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has revolutionized the treatment landscape for colorectal cancer, offering patients a range of options that prioritize precision, faster recovery, and improved functional outcomes.As surgical techniques continue to evolve, methods such as laparoscopic surgery, robotic-assisted surgery, transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME), and natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) are becoming increasingly integrated into clinical practice.This editorial explores these innovative techniques, their advantages, and the ongoing discussions surrounding their long-term effectiveness in terms of tumor prognosis, highlighting the paradigm shift that MIS represents in the management of colorectal cancer.Laparoscopic surgery has been foundational in minimally invasive approaches.Key studies have confirmed its safety and efficacy compared to traditional open surgery.For example, the MRC CLASICC trial found no significant differences in circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity or complication rates between laparoscopic and open methods, although laparoscopic anterior rectal resection had a higher CRM positive rate.Long-term outcomes, including five-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), showed no significant differences, suggesting laparoscopic techniques can achieve similar oncological results.However, debates persist regarding their long-term implications [1].The COLOR series [2] and COREAN [3] studies echoed these findings, noting benefits like reduced bleeding and faster recovery, while studies such as ALaCaRT [4] and ACOSOG Z6051 [5] raised concerns about CRM negative rates and mesorectal integrity, indicating that laparoscopic surgery may not always be non-inferior to open surgery.Robotic-assisted surgery offers significant advancements in treating ultra-low rectal cancer, addressing challenges posed by traditional laparoscopic techniques.It provides improved dexterity and visualization essential

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer PreventionVol. 26(5)
Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR), Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences and Health Services (IR), Aja University of Medical Sciences (IR), Iranshahr University (IR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.