Developing a Measure of Trust in Recycled Water

ABSTRACT Trust is one major factor that predicts public acceptance of recycled water. However, currently, there exist several measures of trust in recycled water entities (e.g., Trust in Water Providers and Trust in Aquifer Managers). The current research compared prominent measures of trust in recycled water entities. Results indicated that there were meaningful differences among trust measures both in relation to each other and with respect to predicting outcomes (e.g., recycled water acceptance). The current paper reports a study that attempted to understand those potential differences and found that some differences can be categorized as measuring Trust in Water Authorities to Provide Safe Water, Trust in Water Authorities to Mange Risks and Trust in Governments. Given those categorizations, this research presents a nine‐item instrument that can be used to measure those three trust factors. This study provided evidence for the instrument's validity using participants recruited on CloudResearch ( N = 292). The trust factors in this nine‐item measure predicted important outcome variables including acceptance of recycled water even after controlling for domain general trust and disgust sensitivity. The measure provides one common way to measure elements of trust in recycled water, offers the opportunity to compare results of trust in recycled water across studies and potentially helps partially explain differences in the magnitude of trust's relation to recycled water acceptance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water and Environment Journal
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/wej.12987
Primary Topic
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing a Measure of Trust in Recycled Water

Uyen Hoang, Braden Tanner, Dana Mahmoud‐Elhaj, Jenna Holt et al.
Water and Environment Journal
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
article

Developing a Measure of Trust in Recycled Water

Uyen Hoang, Braden Tanner, Dana Mahmoud‐Elhaj, Jenna Holt, Adam Feltz, Asif Muhammad
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Trust is one major factor that predicts public acceptance of recycled water. However, currently, there exist several measures of trust in recycled water entities (e.g., Trust in Water Providers and Trust in Aquifer Managers). The current research compared prominent measures of trust in recycled water entities. Results indicated that there were meaningful differences among trust measures both in relation to each other and with respect to predicting outcomes (e.g., recycled water acceptance). The current paper reports a study that attempted to understand those potential differences and found that some differences can be categorized as measuring Trust in Water Authorities to Provide Safe Water, Trust in Water Authorities to Mange Risks and Trust in Governments. Given those categorizations, this research presents a nine‐item instrument that can be used to measure those three trust factors. This study provided evidence for the instrument's validity using participants recruited on CloudResearch ( N = 292). The trust factors in this nine‐item measure predicted important outcome variables including acceptance of recycled water even after controlling for domain general trust and disgust sensitivity. The measure provides one common way to measure elements of trust in recycled water, offers the opportunity to compare results of trust in recycled water across studies and potentially helps partially explain differences in the magnitude of trust's relation to recycled water acceptance.

Water and Environment JournalVol. 39(4)
University of Oklahoma (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.