Smaller phytoplankton size‐groups control the stoichiometry of the autotrophic community

Abstract In the marine environment, the prevailing paradigm is that larger organisms like diatoms are primary contributors to phytoplankton stoichiometry. Numerous studies investigated the stoichiometry of phytoplankton groups or total community but its dynamics among different size‐groups are not resolved. In exploring the influence of phytoplankton community composition and succession on seasonal stoichiometry in the Baltic Sea, our study reveals that smaller size‐groups, such as nanoplankton and picoplankton, play a more significant role than traditionally thought. During seasonal transitions in nutrient availability—from nutrient‐rich spring conditions favoring diatoms and dinoflagellates to nitrogen‐limited summer conditions favorable for cyanobacteria—the Baltic Proper exhibits marked shifts in community structure and offers a unique system to investigate stoichiometric dynamics. Our yearly sampling at an offshore station using a size‐fraction protocol unveils that the stoichiometry within larger size fractions (> 20 μ m) does not reflect the overall community's stoichiometry. Instead, nanoplankton and picoplankton dominate nutrient cycling processes despite their smaller size. On any occasion, they represent between 55% and 90% of the biomass making them critical for nitrogen and phosphorus uptake and photosynthetic carbon fixation. These findings challenge the plankton stoichiometry paradigm and highlight the necessity to include these smaller phytoplankton groups into future climate change models to improve predictions regarding ecosystem responses to eutrophication and environmental changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Limnology and Oceanography
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lno.70058
Primary Topic
Marine and coastal ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Smaller phytoplankton size‐groups control the stoichiometry of the autotrophic community

Cathérine Legrand, Hanna Farnelid, Elin Lindehoff, Thomas Mollica
Limnology and Oceanography
Marine and coastal ecosystems
article

Smaller phytoplankton size‐groups control the stoichiometry of the autotrophic community

Cathérine Legrand, Hanna Farnelid, Elin Lindehoff, Thomas Mollica
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the marine environment, the prevailing paradigm is that larger organisms like diatoms are primary contributors to phytoplankton stoichiometry. Numerous studies investigated the stoichiometry of phytoplankton groups or total community but its dynamics among different size‐groups are not resolved. In exploring the influence of phytoplankton community composition and succession on seasonal stoichiometry in the Baltic Sea, our study reveals that smaller size‐groups, such as nanoplankton and picoplankton, play a more significant role than traditionally thought. During seasonal transitions in nutrient availability—from nutrient‐rich spring conditions favoring diatoms and dinoflagellates to nitrogen‐limited summer conditions favorable for cyanobacteria—the Baltic Proper exhibits marked shifts in community structure and offers a unique system to investigate stoichiometric dynamics. Our yearly sampling at an offshore station using a size‐fraction protocol unveils that the stoichiometry within larger size fractions (> 20 μ m) does not reflect the overall community's stoichiometry. Instead, nanoplankton and picoplankton dominate nutrient cycling processes despite their smaller size. On any occasion, they represent between 55% and 90% of the biomass making them critical for nitrogen and phosphorus uptake and photosynthetic carbon fixation. These findings challenge the plankton stoichiometry paradigm and highlight the necessity to include these smaller phytoplankton groups into future climate change models to improve predictions regarding ecosystem responses to eutrophication and environmental changes.

Limnology and OceanographyVol. 70(7)
Linnaeus University (SE), Halmstad University (SE)
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas, Crafoordska Stiftelsen, Vetenskapsrådet
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Marine and coastal ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Smaller phytoplankton size‐groups control the stoichiometry of the autotrophic community — Cathérine Legrand, Hanna Farnelid, et al. · Limnology and Oceanography (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS