Role of Government in Changing Institutional Furniture for Firms in Digital Economy: Mixed Blessings from China

Even though the advancement of the digital economy has received ardent support, its development in Western societies has been perplexing owing to the predatory nature of firms. In contrast, this is less of an issue in China. In this article, the different forces that influence the socio-cultural values of “institutional furniture” (a notion of Thorstein Veblen) in the Western and Chinese contexts are discussed. Then, the positive/dominant but controversial role of the Chinese government in changing the institutional furniture to discipline firms in the digital economy are explicated. Through the newly instituted process for production and exchange, the predatory activities of Chinese digital firms also evolve but have been controlled to a certain extent within the country. However, differences in the political culture of China and the Western countries have impeded the global development of these Chinese firms. To achieve progressive ends, effective communication between a government and firms in the country and among governments of different countries is necessary.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Issues
Published
2025-04-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2025.2493529
Primary Topic
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role of Government in Changing Institutional Furniture for Firms in Digital Economy: Mixed Blessings from China

Ricardo C.S. Siu
Journal of Economic Issues
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
article

Role of Government in Changing Institutional Furniture for Firms in Digital Economy: Mixed Blessings from China

Ricardo C.S. Siu
article en

Abstract

Even though the advancement of the digital economy has received ardent support, its development in Western societies has been perplexing owing to the predatory nature of firms. In contrast, this is less of an issue in China. In this article, the different forces that influence the socio-cultural values of “institutional furniture” (a notion of Thorstein Veblen) in the Western and Chinese contexts are discussed. Then, the positive/dominant but controversial role of the Chinese government in changing the institutional furniture to discipline firms in the digital economy are explicated. Through the newly instituted process for production and exchange, the predatory activities of Chinese digital firms also evolve but have been controlled to a certain extent within the country. However, differences in the political culture of China and the Western countries have impeded the global development of these Chinese firms. To achieve progressive ends, effective communication between a government and firms in the country and among governments of different countries is necessary.

Journal of Economic IssuesVol. 59(2)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Cultural Industries and Urban Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Role of Government in Changing Institutional Furniture for Firms in Digital Economy: Mixed Blessings from China — Ricardo C.S. Siu · Journal of Economic Issues (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS