Blocking the Gender Recognition Reform Bill

Section 35 of the Scotland Act 1998 allows the Secretary of State for Scotland, a minister of the UK government, to prohibit a bill passed by the Scottish Parliament from being submitted for royal assent. The exercise of such a power is no light matter. There is a danger that the basic principles of devolution might be undermined. There is a danger of an abuse of power for political ends. The power was by Alister Jack, the then Secretary of State for Scotland, by an order made on 17 January 2023, to strike down a bill on gender recognition reform which had been passed by a large majority of the Scottish Parliament after years of consultation, evidence-taking, deliberation and debate. The Scottish government petitioned the Court of Session to have the order struck down. The petition failed. This article suggests that the decision is disappointing and constitutionally dangerous.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Edinburgh Law Review
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3366/elr.2025.0956
Primary Topic
Gender Politics and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blocking the Gender Recognition Reform Bill

Eric Clive
Edinburgh Law Review
Gender Politics and Representation
article

Blocking the Gender Recognition Reform Bill

Eric Clive
article en

Abstract

Section 35 of the Scotland Act 1998 allows the Secretary of State for Scotland, a minister of the UK government, to prohibit a bill passed by the Scottish Parliament from being submitted for royal assent. The exercise of such a power is no light matter. There is a danger that the basic principles of devolution might be undermined. There is a danger of an abuse of power for political ends. The power was by Alister Jack, the then Secretary of State for Scotland, by an order made on 17 January 2023, to strike down a bill on gender recognition reform which had been passed by a large majority of the Scottish Parliament after years of consultation, evidence-taking, deliberation and debate. The Scottish government petitioned the Court of Session to have the order struck down. The petition failed. This article suggests that the decision is disappointing and constitutionally dangerous.

Edinburgh Law ReviewVol. 29(2)
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Gender Politics and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.