Testing a Digital Sustainable Regenerative Teaching Framework in an Architectural Undergraduate Design Studio
We are confronted with an urgent imperative to transition from merely minimizing harm to developing sustainable, regenerative, and net-positive solutions that systematically restore ecosystems, achieve decarbonization, and enhance health outcomes. This study presents a phased Digital Sustainable Regenerative Design Studio framework, which was implemented in a third-year architecture studio at the Canadian University of Dubai. This methodology incorporates bespoke environmental simulation tools alongside quantitative metrics for climate adaptation, biodiversity, carbon sequestration, and health outcomes to inform creative design solutions. The students devised interventions across 20 urban plots in Dubai. A comprehensive analysis, encompassing real-time engagement with computational tools, reflective journals, feedback sessions, project analysis, and surveys, was conducted to assess the framework’s effectiveness in enhancing students’ comprehension of regenerative design and to examine their responses to complex, interdisciplinary challenges. Key findings reveal improved student performance in applying regenerative design principles and the formulation of strategies for climate-adaptive urbanism. The results suggest that this educational framework has the potential to influence and enhance pedagogical approaches, fostering architects committed to advancing sustainable, regenerative, and climate-adaptive urbanism.
Authors
- Massimo Imparato
- Emanuele Naboni (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6381-6491)
- Simona Azzali (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2483-0781)
Institutions
- Canadian University of Dubai (AE)
- Universidad de Sevilla (ES)
- Schools of Visual Arts, The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts (DK)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Sustainability
- Published
- 2025-05-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/su17115004
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.01