Machine Learning-Enhanced River Ice Identification in the Complex Tibetan Plateau

Accurate remote sensing identification of river ice not only provides scientific evidence for climate change but also offers early warning information for disasters such as ice jams. Currently, many researchers have used remote sensing index-based methods to identify river ice in alpine regions. However, in high-altitude areas, these index-based methods face limitations in recognizing river ice and distinguishing ice-snow mixtures. With the rapid advancement of machine learning techniques, some scholars have begun to use machine learning methods to extract river ice in northern latitudes. However, there is still a lack of systematic studies on the ability of machine learning to enhance river ice identification in high-altitude, complex terrains. The study evaluates the performance of machine learning methods and the RDRI index method across six aspects: river type, altitude, river width, ice periods, satellite data, and snow cover interference. The results show that machine learning, particularly the RF method, demonstrates superior generalization ability and higher recognition accuracy for river ice in the complex high-altitude terrain of the Tibetan Plateau by leveraging a variety of input data, including spectral and topographical information. The RF model performs best under all types of test conditions, with an average Kappa coefficient of 0.9088, outperforming other machine learning methods and significantly outperforming the traditional exponential method, demonstrating stronger recognition capabilities. Machine learning methods are adaptable to different types of river ice, showing particularly improved recognition of river ice in braided river systems. RF and SVM exhibit more accurate river ice recognition across different altitudinal gradients, with RF and SVM significantly improving the identification accuracy of river ice (0–90 m) on the plateau. RF and SVM methods offer more precise boundary recognition when identifying river ice across different ice periods. Additionally, RF demonstrates better generalization in the transfer of multisource satellite data. RF’s performance is outstanding under different snow cover conditions, overcoming the limitations of traditional methods in identifying river ice under thick snow. Machine learning methods, which are well suited for large sample learning and have strong generalization capabilities, show significant potential for application in river ice identification within high-altitude, complex terrains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17111889
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning-Enhanced River Ice Identification in the Complex Tibetan Plateau

Xiaohua Hao, Liting Niu, Hongrui Ren, Yiwei Liu et al.
1 citations
Remote Sensing
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
1.30
article

Machine Learning-Enhanced River Ice Identification in the Complex Tibetan Plateau

Xiaohua Hao, Liting Niu, Hongrui Ren, Yiwei Liu, Hongyi Li, Yaru Yang, Xin Pang, Qin Zhao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Accurate remote sensing identification of river ice not only provides scientific evidence for climate change but also offers early warning information for disasters such as ice jams. Currently, many researchers have used remote sensing index-based methods to identify river ice in alpine regions. However, in high-altitude areas, these index-based methods face limitations in recognizing river ice and distinguishing ice-snow mixtures. With the rapid advancement of machine learning techniques, some scholars have begun to use machine learning methods to extract river ice in northern latitudes. However, there is still a lack of systematic studies on the ability of machine learning to enhance river ice identification in high-altitude, complex terrains. The study evaluates the performance of machine learning methods and the RDRI index method across six aspects: river type, altitude, river width, ice periods, satellite data, and snow cover interference. The results show that machine learning, particularly the RF method, demonstrates superior generalization ability and higher recognition accuracy for river ice in the complex high-altitude terrain of the Tibetan Plateau by leveraging a variety of input data, including spectral and topographical information. The RF model performs best under all types of test conditions, with an average Kappa coefficient of 0.9088, outperforming other machine learning methods and significantly outperforming the traditional exponential method, demonstrating stronger recognition capabilities. Machine learning methods are adaptable to different types of river ice, showing particularly improved recognition of river ice in braided river systems. RF and SVM exhibit more accurate river ice recognition across different altitudinal gradients, with RF and SVM significantly improving the identification accuracy of river ice (0–90 m) on the plateau. RF and SVM methods offer more precise boundary recognition when identifying river ice across different ice periods. Additionally, RF demonstrates better generalization in the transfer of multisource satellite data. RF’s performance is outstanding under different snow cover conditions, overcoming the limitations of traditional methods in identifying river ice under thick snow. Machine learning methods, which are well suited for large sample learning and have strong generalization capabilities, show significant potential for application in river ice identification within high-altitude, complex terrains.

Remote SensingVol. 17(11)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Taiyuan University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
1.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.