Insect invasion success depends on taxon and trophic group

The majority of non-native animal species globally are insects, though some insect species are more successful invaders than others. These differences can be attributed, in part, to differences among dominant trophic groups. Previous analyses indicate that insect herbivores are generally over-represented among non-native species while other groups, such as predators, are under-represented. Here we explore how invasion success varies among insect taxa and trophic groups. We quantify over-representation in species grouped by taxon (order or family) and larval trophic group (herbivore, detritivore, predator, parasite, brood carer); over- and under-representation is computed by comparing proportional representation of groups among non-native species in 12 world regions with total numbers in these same groups globally. Although herbivores are generally the most successful group among non-natives, we found their invasion success to vary among their taxonomic groups: herbivores are over-represented among Hemiptera, Diptera, Thysanoptera and Hymenoptera, but under-represented among Lepidoptera and Orthoptera; similar patterns are seen at the family-level within orders. Even after accounting for trophic group, some orders were still over-represented. Within trophic groups, this pattern appeared strongest for herbivores, where predominantly parthenogenetic families belonging to the Hemiptera and Thysanoptera were over-represented in non-native assemblages, while families in the Lepidoptera and Polyneoptera were under-represented. Over time (1850s to 2000s), fractions of non-native species numbers in certain orders and trophic groups have varied, such as among parasites, where a considerable turnover took place from mostly bird-lice (Psocodea) in the 19 th century to parasitic wasps (Hymenoptera) in the 20 th century. It is thus likely that factors other than trophic group, such as associations with invasion pathways (e.g., plants, wood packaging), cause the observed differences in the over-representation of families belonging to different orders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NeoBiota
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.99.151227
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.27

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insect invasion success depends on taxon and trophic group

Helen F. Nahrung, Cléo Bertelsmeier, Eckehard G. Brockerhoff, Gyda Fenn‐Moltu et al.
4 citations
NeoBiota
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
7.27
article

Insect invasion success depends on taxon and trophic group

Helen F. Nahrung, Cléo Bertelsmeier, Eckehard G. Brockerhoff, Gyda Fenn‐Moltu, Alain Roques, Rebecca M. Turner, Andrew M. Liebhold, Takehiko Yamanaka, Richard Mally, Deepa S. Pureswaran
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The majority of non-native animal species globally are insects, though some insect species are more successful invaders than others. These differences can be attributed, in part, to differences among dominant trophic groups. Previous analyses indicate that insect herbivores are generally over-represented among non-native species while other groups, such as predators, are under-represented. Here we explore how invasion success varies among insect taxa and trophic groups. We quantify over-representation in species grouped by taxon (order or family) and larval trophic group (herbivore, detritivore, predator, parasite, brood carer); over- and under-representation is computed by comparing proportional representation of groups among non-native species in 12 world regions with total numbers in these same groups globally. Although herbivores are generally the most successful group among non-natives, we found their invasion success to vary among their taxonomic groups: herbivores are over-represented among Hemiptera, Diptera, Thysanoptera and Hymenoptera, but under-represented among Lepidoptera and Orthoptera; similar patterns are seen at the family-level within orders. Even after accounting for trophic group, some orders were still over-represented. Within trophic groups, this pattern appeared strongest for herbivores, where predominantly parthenogenetic families belonging to the Hemiptera and Thysanoptera were over-represented in non-native assemblages, while families in the Lepidoptera and Polyneoptera were under-represented. Over time (1850s to 2000s), fractions of non-native species numbers in certain orders and trophic groups have varied, such as among parasites, where a considerable turnover took place from mostly bird-lice (Psocodea) in the 19 th century to parasitic wasps (Hymenoptera) in the 20 th century. It is thus likely that factors other than trophic group, such as associations with invasion pathways (e.g., plants, wood packaging), cause the observed differences in the over-representation of families belonging to different orders.

NeoBiotaVol. 99
Canadian Forest Service (CA), National Agriculture and Food Research Organization (JP), Scion (NZ), University of the Sunshine Coast (AU), Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZ), Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Ecologie et Ecophysiologie Forestières (FR), University of Lausanne (CH)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center, European Commission, Universitetet i Bergen, U.S. Forest Service, Research Executive Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
7.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.