Deep Learning-Based Detection of Honey Storage Areas in Apis mellifera Colonies for Predicting Physical Parameters of Honey via Linear Regression

Traditional methods for assessing honey storage in beehives predominantly rely on manual visual inspection, which often leads to inconsistencies and inefficiencies. This study presents an automated deep learning approach utilizing the YOLOv11 model to detect, classify, and quantify honey cells within <i>Apis mellifera</i> frames across monthly sampling periods. The model's performance varied depending on image resolution and dataset partitioning. Using the free version of YOLOv11 with high-resolution images (960 × 960 resolution) and a dataset split of 90:5:5 for training, validating, and testing, the model achieved a mean average precision at IoU threshold of 0.5 ([email protected]) of 83.4% for uncapped honey cells and 80.5% for capped honey cells. A strong correlation (r = 0.94) was observed between the 90:5:5 and 80:10:10 dataset splits, indicating that increasing the volume of training data enhances classification accuracy. In parallel, the study investigated the relationship between the physical properties of honey and image-based honey storage detection. Of the four tested properties, electrical conductivity (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.19) and color (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.21) showed weak predictive power for honey storage area estimation, with even weaker associations found for pH and moisture content. The honey storage areas via 90:5:5 and 80:10:10 datasets moderately correlated (r = 0.44-0.46) with increasing electrical conductivity and color. Especially, electrical conductivity exhibited statistically significant correlations with dataset performance across different dataset splits (<i>p</i> < 0.05), suggesting some potential influence of chemical composition on model accuracy. Our findings demonstrate the viability of image-based honey classification as a reliable technique for monitoring beehive productivity. Additionally, the research on image-based honey detection can be a non-invasive solution for improved honey production, beehive productivity, and optimized beekeeping practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insects
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/insects16060575
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Bee Products Chemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deep Learning-Based Detection of Honey Storage Areas in Apis mellifera Colonies for Predicting Physical Parameters of Honey via Linear Regression

Patcharin Phokasem, Watit Khokthong, Terd Disayathanoowat, Chainarong Sinpoo et al.
1 citations
Insects
Bee Products Chemical Analysis
1.67
article

Deep Learning-Based Detection of Honey Storage Areas in Apis mellifera Colonies for Predicting Physical Parameters of Honey via Linear Regression

Patcharin Phokasem, Watit Khokthong, Terd Disayathanoowat, Chainarong Sinpoo, Phuwasit Takioawong, Panpakorn Kritangkoon
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Traditional methods for assessing honey storage in beehives predominantly rely on manual visual inspection, which often leads to inconsistencies and inefficiencies. This study presents an automated deep learning approach utilizing the YOLOv11 model to detect, classify, and quantify honey cells within <i>Apis mellifera</i> frames across monthly sampling periods. The model's performance varied depending on image resolution and dataset partitioning. Using the free version of YOLOv11 with high-resolution images (960 × 960 resolution) and a dataset split of 90:5:5 for training, validating, and testing, the model achieved a mean average precision at IoU threshold of 0.5 ([email protected]) of 83.4% for uncapped honey cells and 80.5% for capped honey cells. A strong correlation (r = 0.94) was observed between the 90:5:5 and 80:10:10 dataset splits, indicating that increasing the volume of training data enhances classification accuracy. In parallel, the study investigated the relationship between the physical properties of honey and image-based honey storage detection. Of the four tested properties, electrical conductivity (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.19) and color (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.21) showed weak predictive power for honey storage area estimation, with even weaker associations found for pH and moisture content. The honey storage areas via 90:5:5 and 80:10:10 datasets moderately correlated (r = 0.44-0.46) with increasing electrical conductivity and color. Especially, electrical conductivity exhibited statistically significant correlations with dataset performance across different dataset splits (<i>p</i> < 0.05), suggesting some potential influence of chemical composition on model accuracy. Our findings demonstrate the viability of image-based honey classification as a reliable technique for monitoring beehive productivity. Additionally, the research on image-based honey detection can be a non-invasive solution for improved honey production, beehive productivity, and optimized beekeeping practices.

InsectsVol. 16(6)
Chiang Mai University (TH)
Chiang Mai University, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Bee Products Chemical Analysis
1.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.