The Orbital Destruction Intensity Classification—An Easy-to-Use, Numerical Scale for Assessing the Severity of Orbital Fractures

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Orbital fractures are a very serious problem due to the close location of the eyeball and a direct path to brain injuries, which is associated with serious consequences. This study aims to assess the usefulness of the Orbital Destruction Intensity (ODI) scale. Additionally, this article includes elements of an epidemiological study. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective study of 160 patients admitted to the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery in Łódź (Poland) between January 2021 and June 2024 was conducted. In this study, general patient information (gender, age), details about the injuries (cause, affected orbit, accompanying symptoms), diagnosis (ODI scale, pathological classification), and treatment were assessed. Analysis of the distribution of features and regression analysis was performed in the case of quantitative data. To compare the assessment of the impact of a categorical variable on a quantitative variable, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. <b>Results</b>: The main cause of the accident was assault, which accounted for 39% of cases. An X-ray examination showed that patients had an average ODI score of 2.92 ± 1.69. Patients with low ODI scores mostly had isolated fractures of the orbital floor. As ODI scores increased, zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMCO) fractures became more common as an additional fracture (<i>p</i> < 0.05). For patients with low ODI scores, treatment generally involves reconstructing the orbital wall with titanium mesh. For those with higher ODI scores, treatment may include microplate osteosynthesis or a combination of both methods (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Conclusions</b>: A correlation was observed between the diagnosis based on ODI, anatomical classification, and the treatment provided. This relationship is related to the nature of the ODI scale, as, when the severity of the injury increases, additional anatomical structures (walls or rims of the orbit) are included.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113826
Primary Topic
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Orbital Destruction Intensity Classification—An Easy-to-Use, Numerical Scale for Assessing the Severity of Orbital Fractures

Izabela Gabryelczak, Marcin Kozakiewicz, Katarzyna Bogusiak, Agata Ciosek et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
article

The Orbital Destruction Intensity Classification—An Easy-to-Use, Numerical Scale for Assessing the Severity of Orbital Fractures

Izabela Gabryelczak, Marcin Kozakiewicz, Katarzyna Bogusiak, Agata Ciosek, Kacper Galant
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Orbital fractures are a very serious problem due to the close location of the eyeball and a direct path to brain injuries, which is associated with serious consequences. This study aims to assess the usefulness of the Orbital Destruction Intensity (ODI) scale. Additionally, this article includes elements of an epidemiological study. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective study of 160 patients admitted to the Department of Maxillofacial Surgery in Łódź (Poland) between January 2021 and June 2024 was conducted. In this study, general patient information (gender, age), details about the injuries (cause, affected orbit, accompanying symptoms), diagnosis (ODI scale, pathological classification), and treatment were assessed. Analysis of the distribution of features and regression analysis was performed in the case of quantitative data. To compare the assessment of the impact of a categorical variable on a quantitative variable, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. <b>Results</b>: The main cause of the accident was assault, which accounted for 39% of cases. An X-ray examination showed that patients had an average ODI score of 2.92 ± 1.69. Patients with low ODI scores mostly had isolated fractures of the orbital floor. As ODI scores increased, zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMCO) fractures became more common as an additional fracture (<i>p</i> < 0.05). For patients with low ODI scores, treatment generally involves reconstructing the orbital wall with titanium mesh. For those with higher ODI scores, treatment may include microplate osteosynthesis or a combination of both methods (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Conclusions</b>: A correlation was observed between the diagnosis based on ODI, anatomical classification, and the treatment provided. This relationship is related to the nature of the ODI scale, as, when the severity of the injury increases, additional anatomical structures (walls or rims of the orbit) are included.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(11)
Medical University of Lodz (PL)
Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lodzi
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.