Role of quantum measurements when testing the quantum nature of gravity

In order to empirically test the quantum nature of gravity, it is essential to explore the construction of classical gravity theories that are as consistent with experiments as possible. In particular, the classical gravity field must receive input regarding matter distribution. Previously, such input has been constructed by taking expectation values of the matter density operator on the quantum state, or by using the outcomes of all measurements being performed on the quantum system---or by using information obtained by auxiliary observers (like those that lead to the continuous spontaneous localization and Diosi-Penrose collapses) that continuously monitor the quantum dynamics. We propose a framework that unifies these models, and argue that the Causal Conditional Formulation of Schr"odinger-Newton (CCSN) theory, which takes classical inputs only from experimental and environmental channels---without auxiliary observers---is a minimum model within this framework. Since CCSN can be viewed as a quantum feedback control scheme, it can be made explicitly causal and free from pathologies that previously plagued Schr"odinger-Newton theories. Since classical information from measurement results are used to generate classical gravity, CCSN can mimic quantum gravity better than one would naively expect for a classical theory---making it more subtle to perform tests of the quantum nature of gravity. We predict experimental signatures of CCSN in two concrete scenarios: (i) a single test mass continuously monitored by light, and (ii) two objects interacting via mutual gravity, each monitored separately. In case (i), we show that the mass-concentration effect of self classical gravity still makes CCSN much easier to test than testing the establishment of mutual entanglement, yet the signatures are more subtle than previously thought for classical gravity theories. Using time-delayed measurements and nonstationary measurements, which delay or suspend the flow of classical information into classical gravity, one can make CCSN more detectable. In case (ii), we show that mutual gravity generated by CCSN can lead to correlations that largely mimic signatures of quantum entanglement in steady-state measurements. Rigorous protocols that rule out local operation and classical communication channels, which are experimentally more challenging than simply testing steady-state entanglement, must be applied in order to completely rule out CCSN.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.111.104084
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Role of quantum measurements when testing the quantum nature of gravity

Daisuke Miki, Yubao Liu, Yiqiu Ma, Youka Kaku et al.
2 citations
Physical review. D/Physical review. D.
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
2.49
article

Role of quantum measurements when testing the quantum nature of gravity

Daisuke Miki, Yubao Liu, Yiqiu Ma, Youka Kaku, Yanbei Chen
article en
2 citations

Abstract

In order to empirically test the quantum nature of gravity, it is essential to explore the construction of classical gravity theories that are as consistent with experiments as possible. In particular, the classical gravity field must receive input regarding matter distribution. Previously, such input has been constructed by taking expectation values of the matter density operator on the quantum state, or by using the outcomes of all measurements being performed on the quantum system---or by using information obtained by auxiliary observers (like those that lead to the continuous spontaneous localization and Diosi-Penrose collapses) that continuously monitor the quantum dynamics. We propose a framework that unifies these models, and argue that the Causal Conditional Formulation of Schr\"odinger-Newton (CCSN) theory, which takes classical inputs only from experimental and environmental channels---without auxiliary observers---is a minimum model within this framework. Since CCSN can be viewed as a quantum feedback control scheme, it can be made explicitly causal and free from pathologies that previously plagued Schr\"odinger-Newton theories. Since classical information from measurement results are used to generate classical gravity, CCSN can mimic quantum gravity better than one would naively expect for a classical theory---making it more subtle to perform tests of the quantum nature of gravity. We predict experimental signatures of CCSN in two concrete scenarios: (i) a single test mass continuously monitored by light, and (ii) two objects interacting via mutual gravity, each monitored separately. In case (i), we show that the mass-concentration effect of self classical gravity still makes CCSN much easier to test than testing the establishment of mutual entanglement, yet the signatures are more subtle than previously thought for classical gravity theories. Using time-delayed measurements and nonstationary measurements, which delay or suspend the flow of classical information into classical gravity, one can make CCSN more detectable. In case (ii), we show that mutual gravity generated by CCSN can lead to correlations that largely mimic signatures of quantum entanglement in steady-state measurements. Rigorous protocols that rule out local operation and classical communication channels, which are experimentally more challenging than simply testing steady-state entanglement, must be applied in order to completely rule out CCSN.

Physical review. D/Physical review. D.Vol. 111(10)
California Institute of Technology (US), Kyushu University (JP), Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN), Nagoya University (JP)
Simons Foundation, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Quantum Mechanics and Applications
2.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.