Application of Quantitative Methods to Identify Analogous Cities: A Search for Relevant Experiences in the Development of Smart Cities for Implementation in Kazakhstan

Rapid urban growth and the spread of the concept of smart cities force an increasing need to understand how cities become “smart” and apply their experience where it will best take root. Understanding which experience will be most suitable is not a trivial task and requires labor-intensive analysis. This study aims to identify smart cities that are most similar to Almaty and Astana in terms of key indicators by applying quantitative methods. Using a sample of smart cities, this paper successively employs three methods—principal component analysis, hierarchical cluster analysis, and t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding. The results showed that Denver and Ottawa are the closest to Almaty and Astana, followed by Ankara and Phoenix. The proposed methodology allowed us to assess the similarity of urban development conditions, with an assumption that similar development conditions determine approaches to the development of smart cities, and thus the relevance of experiences from other smart cities worldwide could be applied to Almaty and Astana. This approach is intended to contribute to the effectiveness of transferring advanced solutions of smart city development to the context of Kazakhstan. The obtained conclusions can be used to form recommendations for the development strategy of Almaty and Astana, as well as other cities facing similar challenges.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Smart Cities
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities8030092
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
11.18
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Application of Quantitative Methods to Identify Analogous Cities: A Search for Relevant Experiences in the Development of Smart Cities for Implementation in Kazakhstan

Marat Urdabayev, Anel Kireyeva, Ivan Digel
2 citations
Smart Cities
Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends
11.18
article

Application of Quantitative Methods to Identify Analogous Cities: A Search for Relevant Experiences in the Development of Smart Cities for Implementation in Kazakhstan

Marat Urdabayev, Anel Kireyeva, Ivan Digel
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Rapid urban growth and the spread of the concept of smart cities force an increasing need to understand how cities become “smart” and apply their experience where it will best take root. Understanding which experience will be most suitable is not a trivial task and requires labor-intensive analysis. This study aims to identify smart cities that are most similar to Almaty and Astana in terms of key indicators by applying quantitative methods. Using a sample of smart cities, this paper successively employs three methods—principal component analysis, hierarchical cluster analysis, and t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding. The results showed that Denver and Ottawa are the closest to Almaty and Astana, followed by Ankara and Phoenix. The proposed methodology allowed us to assess the similarity of urban development conditions, with an assumption that similar development conditions determine approaches to the development of smart cities, and thus the relevance of experiences from other smart cities worldwide could be applied to Almaty and Astana. This approach is intended to contribute to the effectiveness of transferring advanced solutions of smart city development to the context of Kazakhstan. The obtained conclusions can be used to form recommendations for the development strategy of Almaty and Astana, as well as other cities facing similar challenges.

Smart CitiesVol. 8(3)
University of Kassel (DE), Al-Farabi Kazakh National University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends
11.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.