The Synergy and Accumulation Model for Analysis (SAMA): A Novel Approach to Transforming Risk Analysis in Construction with a Focus on the Deepwater Horizon Disaster Case

Risk analysis is critical for preventing catastrophic failures in complex systems, as exemplified by the Deepwater Horizon disaster, a stark reminder of systemic vulnerabilities in offshore drilling operations, where inadequate appraisal of overlapping failures led to severe environmental and human losses. This study addresses the absence of a predictive framework capable of capturing cumulative risk interactions across both time stages and defensive layers. To fill this gap, and by drawing on prior frameworks such as the Swiss Cheese Model (SCM) and the Risk Matrix (RM), as well as critiques of their limitations, we introduce the Synergy and Accumulation Model for Analysis (SAMA). This model defines project life-cycle stages and risk recipients, characterizes each risk by four parameters (the focus of impact, suddenness, frequency, and effectiveness), and calculates horizontal (RFh) and vertical (RFv) risk factors. We applied SAMA to fifteen identified failure modes of the Macondo well, categorizing them across two time stages (operational and construction) and four defensive layers. Horizontal analysis revealed that the regulatory-laws layer accumulated the highest risk factors, RFh1laws = 129.25 during the operational stage and RFh2laws = 95.98 during the construction stage. Vertical analysis showed that the safety objective experienced the greatest systemic vulnerability, with RFvsafety = 135.8 across ten overlapping risks, followed by the quality objective at RFvquality = 128.39. These findings demonstrate SAMA’s enhanced capability to identify critical collapse paths often overlooked by conventional models. For researchers, SAMA offers a transparent, parameter-driven methodology applicable across engineering and construction domains. For industry stakeholders, regulators, project managers, and safety engineers, this model provides actionable insights to prioritize resource allocation and strengthen specific defensive layers, thereby enhancing both preventive planning and resilience against future disasters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15111879
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Synergy and Accumulation Model for Analysis (SAMA): A Novel Approach to Transforming Risk Analysis in Construction with a Focus on the Deepwater Horizon Disaster Case

Hassan Malekitabar, Saeed Banihashemi, Ali Akbar Shirzadi Javid, Elias Medaa
2 citations
Buildings
Risk and Safety Analysis
2.80
article

The Synergy and Accumulation Model for Analysis (SAMA): A Novel Approach to Transforming Risk Analysis in Construction with a Focus on the Deepwater Horizon Disaster Case

Hassan Malekitabar, Saeed Banihashemi, Ali Akbar Shirzadi Javid, Elias Medaa
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Risk analysis is critical for preventing catastrophic failures in complex systems, as exemplified by the Deepwater Horizon disaster, a stark reminder of systemic vulnerabilities in offshore drilling operations, where inadequate appraisal of overlapping failures led to severe environmental and human losses. This study addresses the absence of a predictive framework capable of capturing cumulative risk interactions across both time stages and defensive layers. To fill this gap, and by drawing on prior frameworks such as the Swiss Cheese Model (SCM) and the Risk Matrix (RM), as well as critiques of their limitations, we introduce the Synergy and Accumulation Model for Analysis (SAMA). This model defines project life-cycle stages and risk recipients, characterizes each risk by four parameters (the focus of impact, suddenness, frequency, and effectiveness), and calculates horizontal (RFh) and vertical (RFv) risk factors. We applied SAMA to fifteen identified failure modes of the Macondo well, categorizing them across two time stages (operational and construction) and four defensive layers. Horizontal analysis revealed that the regulatory-laws layer accumulated the highest risk factors, RFh1laws = 129.25 during the operational stage and RFh2laws = 95.98 during the construction stage. Vertical analysis showed that the safety objective experienced the greatest systemic vulnerability, with RFvsafety = 135.8 across ten overlapping risks, followed by the quality objective at RFvquality = 128.39. These findings demonstrate SAMA’s enhanced capability to identify critical collapse paths often overlooked by conventional models. For researchers, SAMA offers a transparent, parameter-driven methodology applicable across engineering and construction domains. For industry stakeholders, regulators, project managers, and safety engineers, this model provides actionable insights to prioritize resource allocation and strengthen specific defensive layers, thereby enhancing both preventive planning and resilience against future disasters.

BuildingsVol. 15(11)
University of Technology Sydney (AU), Iran University of Science and Technology (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Risk and Safety Analysis
2.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.