Biogenic and fossil main greenhouse gas emissions of dairy, beef, pig and poultry systems

Conventional analyses of the carbon footprint of livestock systems do not consider the relationships between the characteristics and sources of each greenhouse gas (GHGs; CH<sub>4</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O, CO<sub>2</sub>) and the different livestock systems. This study aimed to assess the carbon footprint of a variety of livestock systems, including different animal categories (dairy cattle, beef cattle, pig and poultry) and production circumstances (lowland and mountain areas). An attributional cradle-to-gate-of-the-farm Life Cycle Assessment was used, considering the emission pattern of each GHG and distinguishing fossil and biogenic origins. The production stages included animal and manure management, on- and off-farm feed production and the production and use of the farm materials. The functional unit was 1 kg of crude protein in animal food (CPAF). Emissions per single GHG and production stage were analysed with a general linear model which included the effect of the livestock system, which proved to significantly influence the emission pattern of all GHGs, both in absolute terms (kg/kg CPAF) and with respect to the single production stage. The CO<sub>2</sub> (fossil-based) resulted as the most emitted GHG (10.2-27.6 kg/kg CPAF), 10-255 and 284-646 times greater than CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O, respectively. Methane was found to be more associated with the animal category (ruminants), whereas N<sub>2</sub>O and CO<sub>2</sub> were more associated with the input intensity level. Livestock systems strongly influenced the biogenic GHG emissions but not the fossil-related one, with dairy, pig and poultry systems showing similar and lower values than beef. In conclusion, the evaluation of the pattern of each GHG as well as of their biogenic or fossil origin can give indications to address the reduction of global warming.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
animal
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2025.101562
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.43

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biogenic and fossil main greenhouse gas emissions of dairy, beef, pig and poultry systems

Giovanni Bittante, L. Gallo, Stefano Schiavon, Marco Berton et al.
2 citations
animal
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
3.43
article

Biogenic and fossil main greenhouse gas emissions of dairy, beef, pig and poultry systems

Giovanni Bittante, L. Gallo, Stefano Schiavon, Marco Berton, Gerolamo Xiccato, Enrico Sturaro, Alessio Cecchinato
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Conventional analyses of the carbon footprint of livestock systems do not consider the relationships between the characteristics and sources of each greenhouse gas (GHGs; CH<sub>4</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O, CO<sub>2</sub>) and the different livestock systems. This study aimed to assess the carbon footprint of a variety of livestock systems, including different animal categories (dairy cattle, beef cattle, pig and poultry) and production circumstances (lowland and mountain areas). An attributional cradle-to-gate-of-the-farm Life Cycle Assessment was used, considering the emission pattern of each GHG and distinguishing fossil and biogenic origins. The production stages included animal and manure management, on- and off-farm feed production and the production and use of the farm materials. The functional unit was 1 kg of crude protein in animal food (CPAF). Emissions per single GHG and production stage were analysed with a general linear model which included the effect of the livestock system, which proved to significantly influence the emission pattern of all GHGs, both in absolute terms (kg/kg CPAF) and with respect to the single production stage. The CO<sub>2</sub> (fossil-based) resulted as the most emitted GHG (10.2-27.6 kg/kg CPAF), 10-255 and 284-646 times greater than CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O, respectively. Methane was found to be more associated with the animal category (ruminants), whereas N<sub>2</sub>O and CO<sub>2</sub> were more associated with the input intensity level. Livestock systems strongly influenced the biogenic GHG emissions but not the fossil-related one, with dairy, pig and poultry systems showing similar and lower values than beef. In conclusion, the evaluation of the pattern of each GHG as well as of their biogenic or fossil origin can give indications to address the reduction of global warming.

animalVol. 19(7)
University of Padua (IT)
Regione del Veneto, Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
3.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.