Dominant domains in vowel harmony: A structural approach to a linear asymmetry

Abstract In this paper, we make two main claims: (i) we claim that a proposed prefix-suffix asymmetry (the absence of dominant prefixes in bi-directional dominant-recessive vowel harmony systems) is in fact a special case of a broader generalization that should be stated in hierarchical terms (domains), not linear order (prefixes), (ii) we contend moreover that the relevant domains are best defined in morphosyntactic terms (the juncture between Aspect and Tense, cf. “phases”) rather than in morphophonological terms (the “stem” of Stratal OT and other work). We offer an account under a slight modification of an existing constraint-based cyclic approach to Vowel Harmony (Kiparsky 2024) and compare this to a rule-based (feature-filling) implementation of the Cyclic Spell-Out of morphosyntactic structure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-025-09668-2
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.24

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dominant domains in vowel harmony: A structural approach to a linear asymmetry

Maria Kouneli, Jonathan David Bobaljik, Paula Fenger
2 citations
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory
Phonetics and Phonology Research
4.24
article

Dominant domains in vowel harmony: A structural approach to a linear asymmetry

Maria Kouneli, Jonathan David Bobaljik, Paula Fenger
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we make two main claims: (i) we claim that a proposed prefix-suffix asymmetry (the absence of dominant prefixes in bi-directional dominant-recessive vowel harmony systems) is in fact a special case of a broader generalization that should be stated in hierarchical terms (domains), not linear order (prefixes), (ii) we contend moreover that the relevant domains are best defined in morphosyntactic terms (the juncture between Aspect and Tense, cf. “phases”) rather than in morphophonological terms (the “stem” of Stratal OT and other work). We offer an account under a slight modification of an existing constraint-based cyclic approach to Vowel Harmony (Kiparsky 2024) and compare this to a rule-based (feature-filling) implementation of the Cyclic Spell-Out of morphosyntactic structure.

Natural Language & Linguistic TheoryVol. 43(4)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Harvard University Press (US), Leibniz Institute for the History and Culture of Eastern Europe (GWZO) (DE), Leipzig University (DE)
Harvard University, University of Connecticut, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Universität Leipzig, Masarykova Univerzita
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
4.24
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Dominant domains in vowel harmony: A structural approach to a linear asymmetry — Maria Kouneli, Jonathan David Bobaljik, et al. · Natural Language & Linguistic Theory (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS