If, and how, to group by ‘ability’ – considerations about class group formation

Many schools choose to organise students into classes according to their perceived “ability”, despite evidence that the practice is not beneficial for students, overall. Class grouping by “ability” can exacerbate existing social inequalities by segregating students according to pre-existing educational advantage, which has unjustifiable consequences from a social justice perspective. There is little understanding of how decisions about class groupings are made, but such understanding is a crucial basis for exploring the persistent prevalence of this inequitable and exclusionary practice in Australian schools. This study characterises within-school processes used to decide how to group students into classes. Surveys were completed by n = 147 schools regarding their class organisational practices, with follow-up interviews conducted with n = 12 participants. Findings suggest that schools draw on prior achievement data to form class groups, but for different purposes. Other sources of information were considered when allocating students into classes, including student effort, behaviour, and parent requests. The schools did not change their grouping practices often, but there was continual consideration of how changes might better meet students’ needs. Further research might consider how schools can be supported in evaluating and revising their class grouping practices, including how students are allocated to class ability groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Educational Studies
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2025.2511914
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

If, and how, to group by ‘ability’ – considerations about class group formation

Olivia Johnston, Nerida Spina, Suzanne Macqueen, Rebecca Spooner‐Lane et al.
2 citations
Educational Studies
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
8.93
article

If, and how, to group by ‘ability’ – considerations about class group formation

Olivia Johnston, Nerida Spina, Suzanne Macqueen, Rebecca Spooner‐Lane, Wei Zhang
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Many schools choose to organise students into classes according to their perceived “ability”, despite evidence that the practice is not beneficial for students, overall. Class grouping by “ability” can exacerbate existing social inequalities by segregating students according to pre-existing educational advantage, which has unjustifiable consequences from a social justice perspective. There is little understanding of how decisions about class groupings are made, but such understanding is a crucial basis for exploring the persistent prevalence of this inequitable and exclusionary practice in Australian schools. This study characterises within-school processes used to decide how to group students into classes. Surveys were completed by n = 147 schools regarding their class organisational practices, with follow-up interviews conducted with n = 12 participants. Findings suggest that schools draw on prior achievement data to form class groups, but for different purposes. Other sources of information were considered when allocating students into classes, including student effort, behaviour, and parent requests. The schools did not change their grouping practices often, but there was continual consideration of how changes might better meet students’ needs. Further research might consider how schools can be supported in evaluating and revising their class grouping practices, including how students are allocated to class ability groups.

Educational StudiesVol. 51(6)
Edith Cowan University (AU), Queensland University of Technology (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.