“The Landscape's Changed and No One's Giving them a New Map”: Positive Masculinity in Boys and Young Men
Background: Rigid adherence to traditional masculine norms is associated with mental ill-health. Positive masculinities have been proposed as more flexible, inclusive, and authentic ways of being, whereby boys and men can embody key human strengths essential to their well-being. Methods: We interviewed 12 school-aged young men, 11 teachers, and 8 parents and employed thematic analysis to examine how positive masculinity is constructed within an Australian all-boys school. Results: Young men endorsed positive masculine traits, such as acceptance of diversity and emotional disclosure. However, as emerging norms competed with traditional ones, some young men were left without a clear idea of ‘how to be’ masculine in the current social and political climate. Conclusions: Results from the present study support going beyond rhetorical messaging espousing what not to do (ie, a deficit-based approach), in advance of simultaneous education regarding what to do instead (ie, a strengths-based approach) when working with young men.
Authors
- Kieran O’Gorman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2087-0532)
- Simon Rice (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4045-8553)
- Zac E. Seidler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6854-1554)
- Judy Y. Chu
- Ray Swann
- Sarah Bonell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1627-0315)
- Krista Fisher (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4066-3637)
- Michael Wilson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8983-0067)
- John L. Oliffe
- Matt Englar-Carson
Institutions
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- California State University, Fullerton (US)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Orygen (AU)
- Stanford University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Journal of Men s Social and Community Health
- Published
- 2025-05-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3138/ijmsch.2024.0007
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 11.60