Drivers, Stages, Offerings, and Impacts of Disciplinary Shifts in System Paradigm-Driven Disciplines:

This paper analyses the multi-faceted development process of system paradigm-driven disciplines (SPDDs) and interprets its drivers, stages, offerings, and impacts of the disciplinary shifts. Due to the extreme broadness of the field, the authors could not consider all pertinent scholarly domains. Instead, they placed mechatronics into the focus of their study, collected evidence from this wide-ranging and highly integrative field of engineering, and used it to underpin their reasoning and propositions. After introducing the topic, goals, and approach, the paper includes an interpretational intermezzo to reduce the conceptual and linguistic Babel associated with modern system science, particularly artificial intelligence in systems. As major drivers behind the observable scholarly changes, the trends of (i) scientific convergence and divergence, (ii) technology integration and synthesis, (iii) paradigmatic nearing of engineered systems, (iv) growing level of cognitive abilities, and (v) multi-faceted socio-ecological embedding have been identified. The authors propose that specific stages and offerings can be found in the development process of most SPDDs (in particular, in mechatronics). Their position is that all implications of the disciplinary shifts can hardly be considered due to the wide variety of the application fields and the diverse functionalities. The authors propose a novel reasoning model concerning the scholarly fields enabling SPDDs. Based on transdisciplinary epistemology, this model identifies the operational knowledge spaces and their relationships that characterize, among many others, mechatronics, cyber-physical systems, and artificial intelligence-based problem-solving systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22545/2025/00276
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Decision Making
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.32
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drivers, Stages, Offerings, and Impacts of Disciplinary Shifts in System Paradigm-Driven Disciplines:

George M. Abraham, Imré Horváth
3 citations
Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science
Complex Systems and Decision Making
6.32
article

Drivers, Stages, Offerings, and Impacts of Disciplinary Shifts in System Paradigm-Driven Disciplines:

George M. Abraham, Imré Horváth
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This paper analyses the multi-faceted development process of system paradigm-driven disciplines (SPDDs) and interprets its drivers, stages, offerings, and impacts of the disciplinary shifts. Due to the extreme broadness of the field, the authors could not consider all pertinent scholarly domains. Instead, they placed mechatronics into the focus of their study, collected evidence from this wide-ranging and highly integrative field of engineering, and used it to underpin their reasoning and propositions. After introducing the topic, goals, and approach, the paper includes an interpretational intermezzo to reduce the conceptual and linguistic Babel associated with modern system science, particularly artificial intelligence in systems. As major drivers behind the observable scholarly changes, the trends of (i) scientific convergence and divergence, (ii) technology integration and synthesis, (iii) paradigmatic nearing of engineered systems, (iv) growing level of cognitive abilities, and (v) multi-faceted socio-ecological embedding have been identified. The authors propose that specific stages and offerings can be found in the development process of most SPDDs (in particular, in mechatronics). Their position is that all implications of the disciplinary shifts can hardly be considered due to the wide variety of the application fields and the diverse functionalities. The authors propose a novel reasoning model concerning the scholarly fields enabling SPDDs. Based on transdisciplinary epistemology, this model identifies the operational knowledge spaces and their relationships that characterize, among many others, mechatronics, cyber-physical systems, and artificial intelligence-based problem-solving systems.

Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & ScienceVol. 16
Budapest University of Technology and Economics (HU), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Complex Systems and Decision Making
6.32
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Drivers, Stages, Offerings, and Impacts of Disciplinary Shifts in System Paradigm-Driven Disciplines: — George M. Abraham, Imré Horváth · Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS