Single-chamber pacemakers: with or without leads? Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses
Leadless pacemakers have fewer complications than conventional pacemakers and, although the device itself is more expensive, the leadless pacemaker is more cost-effective in around 90% of cases.
Authors
- José Luis Martínez‐Sande (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1089-2271)
- José Ramón González‐Juanatey (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9681-3388)
- Francisco Reyes-Santías (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7928-6050)
- Vicent Caballer-Tarazona (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3629-7929)
- Manel Antelo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1846-6872)
- Javier García‐Seara (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7903-9490)
- Moisés Rodríguez‐Mañero (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7566-9321)
- José Ramón Lago-Quinteiro
Institutions
- Universitat de València (ES)
- Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (ES)
- Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
- Centro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (ES)
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago (ES)
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (ES)
- Servicio Gallego de Salud (ES)
- Universidade de Vigo (ES)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Annals of Medicine
- Published
- 2025-05-29
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2025.2512108
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 6.26