The effects of implicit bias interventions on mock jurors’ civil trial decisions and perceptions of the courts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law and Human Behavior
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000610
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Jury Decision Making Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.97

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effects of implicit bias interventions on mock jurors’ civil trial decisions and perceptions of the courts.

Valerie P. Hans, Jessica M. Salerno, Megan Lawrence, Kristen L. Gittings et al.
2 citations
Law and Human Behavior
Jury Decision Making Processes
31.97
article

The effects of implicit bias interventions on mock jurors’ civil trial decisions and perceptions of the courts.

Valerie P. Hans, Jessica M. Salerno, Megan Lawrence, Kristen L. Gittings, John C. Campbell
article en
2 citations

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Law and Human BehaviorVol. 49(3)
Cornell University (US), Institute for Law and Justice (US), Arizona State University (US)
Arizona State University, University of Denver
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Jury Decision Making Processes
31.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.