Comparative Study of Novel Convolutional Neural Network and Artificial Neural Network to Enhance the Accuracy for Flaw Detection in Animal Hide

This research explores how well Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Convolutional Neural Networks (NCNN) detect animal hide imperfections to improve quality of weather. Materials and Methods: The study extracted 3600 leather images from Kaggle and split them into two separate groups for this investigation. Group 1 used NCNN, and Group 2 used ANN. Statistical testing generated a sample size of 20 specimens at 95% confidence with 80% power in this experiment. Python became the chosen programming platform for data analysis and preprocessing. NCNN shows better results than ANN because it delivers 96.80% accuracy at 0.001 significance level (p<0.05). Conclusion: The analysis proves the Novel Convolutional Neural Network successfully finds defects in animal hides, but ANN cannot match its results.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icdsaai65575.2025.11011610
Primary Topic
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Study of Novel Convolutional Neural Network and Artificial Neural Network to Enhance the Accuracy for Flaw Detection in Animal Hide

Rajarajeswari Rathinam, Veeramalai Sankaradass
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
article

Comparative Study of Novel Convolutional Neural Network and Artificial Neural Network to Enhance the Accuracy for Flaw Detection in Animal Hide

Rajarajeswari Rathinam, Veeramalai Sankaradass
article en

Abstract

This research explores how well Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Convolutional Neural Networks (NCNN) detect animal hide imperfections to improve quality of weather. Materials and Methods: The study extracted 3600 leather images from Kaggle and split them into two separate groups for this investigation. Group 1 used NCNN, and Group 2 used ANN. Statistical testing generated a sample size of 20 specimens at 95% confidence with 80% power in this experiment. Python became the chosen programming platform for data analysis and preprocessing. NCNN shows better results than ANN because it delivers 96.80% accuracy at 0.001 significance level (p<0.05). Conclusion: The analysis proves the Novel Convolutional Neural Network successfully finds defects in animal hides, but ANN cannot match its results.

Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.