Evaluation of Retrospective Fusion of SPECT and MRI in Back Pain: A Pilot Study

Objective: MRI is the preferred spinal imaging modality, but lacks metabolic information, while SPECT/CT provides functional information on osteoblastic activity. We aimed to determine if retrospective fusion of SPECT and MRI (SPECT/MRI) enhances disease site identification and reader confidence compared with SPECT/CT or MRI in chronic back pain refractory to medical management. Methods: One hundred and eighteen patients with chronic back pain not responding to medical management and investigated with MRI and SPECT/CT were selected. Two readers compared SPECT/MRI images to sequential reviews of SPECT/CT and MRI, MRI, and SPECT/CT alone. Potential pain generator sites and diagnostic confidence for each modality were recorded. New findings on SPECT/MRI were reviewed at a multidisciplinary meeting (MDM), and potential management changes were recorded. Results: Diagnostic confidence for SPECT/MRI (4.99) was higher than sequential SPECT/CT and MRI (3.8), MRI (3.6), or SPECT/CT (3). SPECT/MRI did not detect new disc disease, but found more sites (1%) in patients with known disc disease compared with other modalities. SPECT/MRI detected more patients and sites of endplate and facet disease compared with other modalities. It found 25% more patients and 49.5% more sites for endplate disease; 31.3% more patients and 46.7% more sites for facet disease compared with sequential review of SPECT/CT and MRI. The MDM review did not change the management for new disc disease sites. However, in 19 (25.6%) patients with new endplate disease, 45 (38.1%) patients with additional endplate disease, 20 (16.9%) patients with new facet disease, and 45 (38.1%) patients with additional facet disease, management changes were adopted. Conclusions: SPECT/MRI in refractory back pain detects additional disc, endplate, and facet disease sites and new patients compared with sequential SPECT/CT, MRI, or SPECT/CT alone, potentially leading to management changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical nuclear medicine open.
Published
2025-05-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/nm9.0000000000000026
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.79
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Retrospective Fusion of SPECT and MRI in Back Pain: A Pilot Study

Eushaa Mirza, Hikmat Jan, Arman Parsaï, Imene Zerizer et al.
2 citations
Clinical nuclear medicine open.
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
2.79
article

Evaluation of Retrospective Fusion of SPECT and MRI in Back Pain: A Pilot Study

Eushaa Mirza, Hikmat Jan, Arman Parsaï, Imene Zerizer, Marc E. Miquel, Adrian Kastler
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Objective: MRI is the preferred spinal imaging modality, but lacks metabolic information, while SPECT/CT provides functional information on osteoblastic activity. We aimed to determine if retrospective fusion of SPECT and MRI (SPECT/MRI) enhances disease site identification and reader confidence compared with SPECT/CT or MRI in chronic back pain refractory to medical management. Methods: One hundred and eighteen patients with chronic back pain not responding to medical management and investigated with MRI and SPECT/CT were selected. Two readers compared SPECT/MRI images to sequential reviews of SPECT/CT and MRI, MRI, and SPECT/CT alone. Potential pain generator sites and diagnostic confidence for each modality were recorded. New findings on SPECT/MRI were reviewed at a multidisciplinary meeting (MDM), and potential management changes were recorded. Results: Diagnostic confidence for SPECT/MRI (4.99) was higher than sequential SPECT/CT and MRI (3.8), MRI (3.6), or SPECT/CT (3). SPECT/MRI did not detect new disc disease, but found more sites (1%) in patients with known disc disease compared with other modalities. SPECT/MRI detected more patients and sites of endplate and facet disease compared with other modalities. It found 25% more patients and 49.5% more sites for endplate disease; 31.3% more patients and 46.7% more sites for facet disease compared with sequential review of SPECT/CT and MRI. The MDM review did not change the management for new disc disease sites. However, in 19 (25.6%) patients with new endplate disease, 45 (38.1%) patients with additional endplate disease, 20 (16.9%) patients with new facet disease, and 45 (38.1%) patients with additional facet disease, management changes were adopted. Conclusions: SPECT/MRI in refractory back pain detects additional disc, endplate, and facet disease sites and new patients compared with sequential SPECT/CT, MRI, or SPECT/CT alone, potentially leading to management changes.

Clinical nuclear medicine open.Vol. 2(2)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), Université Joseph Fourier (FR), King's College London (GB), Barts Health NHS Trust (GB), Thomas Foundation (AU), Dartford And Gravesham NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
2.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.