Evaluation of Retrospective Fusion of SPECT and MRI in Back Pain: A Pilot Study
Objective: MRI is the preferred spinal imaging modality, but lacks metabolic information, while SPECT/CT provides functional information on osteoblastic activity. We aimed to determine if retrospective fusion of SPECT and MRI (SPECT/MRI) enhances disease site identification and reader confidence compared with SPECT/CT or MRI in chronic back pain refractory to medical management. Methods: One hundred and eighteen patients with chronic back pain not responding to medical management and investigated with MRI and SPECT/CT were selected. Two readers compared SPECT/MRI images to sequential reviews of SPECT/CT and MRI, MRI, and SPECT/CT alone. Potential pain generator sites and diagnostic confidence for each modality were recorded. New findings on SPECT/MRI were reviewed at a multidisciplinary meeting (MDM), and potential management changes were recorded. Results: Diagnostic confidence for SPECT/MRI (4.99) was higher than sequential SPECT/CT and MRI (3.8), MRI (3.6), or SPECT/CT (3). SPECT/MRI did not detect new disc disease, but found more sites (1%) in patients with known disc disease compared with other modalities. SPECT/MRI detected more patients and sites of endplate and facet disease compared with other modalities. It found 25% more patients and 49.5% more sites for endplate disease; 31.3% more patients and 46.7% more sites for facet disease compared with sequential review of SPECT/CT and MRI. The MDM review did not change the management for new disc disease sites. However, in 19 (25.6%) patients with new endplate disease, 45 (38.1%) patients with additional endplate disease, 20 (16.9%) patients with new facet disease, and 45 (38.1%) patients with additional facet disease, management changes were adopted. Conclusions: SPECT/MRI in refractory back pain detects additional disc, endplate, and facet disease sites and new patients compared with sequential SPECT/CT, MRI, or SPECT/CT alone, potentially leading to management changes.
Authors
- Eushaa Mirza (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2103-2506)
- Hikmat Jan
- Arman Parsaï (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2377-5429)
- Imene Zerizer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3297-9324)
- Marc E. Miquel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2209-2076)
- Adrian Kastler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6762-094X)
Institutions
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- Université Joseph Fourier (FR)
- King's College London (GB)
- Barts Health NHS Trust (GB)
- Thomas Foundation (AU)
- Dartford And Gravesham NHS Trust (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Clinical nuclear medicine open.
- Published
- 2025-05-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/nm9.0000000000000026
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.79