Benchmarking CNN Architectures for Tool Classification: Evaluating CNN Performance on a Unique Dataset Generated by Novel Image Acquisition System

In this study, we introduce the ToolSurface-144 dataset, which is presented here for the first time. It comprises four subsets – Full R, Full S, Top R, and Top S – each containing 144 tool classes captured under varying illumination conditions and fields of view. A newly developed, patented imaging approach was employed to acquire the data. It is compared with conventional diffuse ring illumination to assess its effectiveness in evaluating state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks. This enabled a more targeted investigation of the role of global shape characteristics such as silhouettes versus localized features like the tool face, cutting edges, and delicate geometrical structures under different training strategies. In this study, we evaluate six state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks—AlexNet, DenseNet161, EfficientNet-B0, ResNet152, ResNet50, and VGG16—using three training strategies: fine-tuning, freezing of pre-trained layers, and training from scratch. The results show that EfficientNet-B0 consistently achieved the highest classification accuracy in nearly all experiments and data sets. Especially using the fine-tuning training strategy, the model achieved 99% accuracy in tool classification. ResNet50 benefited greatly from fine-tuning and freezing, achieving a significant increase in performance compared to training from scratch. In contrast, ResNet152, AlexNet, and VGG16 consistently showed poor classification performance, indicating difficulties regarding learning and generalisation. The results show that diffuse illumination and complete tool views provide the best classification conditions, while restricted image sections with homogeneous illumination negatively affect model performance. Among the evaluated training strategies, fine-tuning proved the most efficient training method for developing CNN models for tool classification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IEEE Access
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3574785
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neural Networks and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking CNN Architectures for Tool Classification: Evaluating CNN Performance on a Unique Dataset Generated by Novel Image Acquisition System

Mühenad Bilal, Markus Bregulla, Ranadheer Podishetti, Daniel Großmann
1 citations
IEEE Access
Neural Networks and Applications
2.48
article

Benchmarking CNN Architectures for Tool Classification: Evaluating CNN Performance on a Unique Dataset Generated by Novel Image Acquisition System

Mühenad Bilal, Markus Bregulla, Ranadheer Podishetti, Daniel Großmann
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this study, we introduce the ToolSurface-144 dataset, which is presented here for the first time. It comprises four subsets – Full R, Full S, Top R, and Top S – each containing 144 tool classes captured under varying illumination conditions and fields of view. A newly developed, patented imaging approach was employed to acquire the data. It is compared with conventional diffuse ring illumination to assess its effectiveness in evaluating state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks. This enabled a more targeted investigation of the role of global shape characteristics such as silhouettes versus localized features like the tool face, cutting edges, and delicate geometrical structures under different training strategies. In this study, we evaluate six state-of-the-art convolutional neural networks—AlexNet, DenseNet161, EfficientNet-B0, ResNet152, ResNet50, and VGG16—using three training strategies: fine-tuning, freezing of pre-trained layers, and training from scratch. The results show that EfficientNet-B0 consistently achieved the highest classification accuracy in nearly all experiments and data sets. Especially using the fine-tuning training strategy, the model achieved 99% accuracy in tool classification. ResNet50 benefited greatly from fine-tuning and freezing, achieving a significant increase in performance compared to training from scratch. In contrast, ResNet152, AlexNet, and VGG16 consistently showed poor classification performance, indicating difficulties regarding learning and generalisation. The results show that diffuse illumination and complete tool views provide the best classification conditions, while restricted image sections with homogeneous illumination negatively affect model performance. Among the evaluated training strategies, fine-tuning proved the most efficient training method for developing CNN models for tool classification.

IEEE AccessVol. 13
Technische Hochschule Ingolstadt (DE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Neural Networks and Applications
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.