Differences in Head Kinematics Experienced by Women’s and Men’s Artistic Gymnasts During Common Skills

This study aimed to characterize differences in head kinematics across similar skills performed by women's (WAG) and men's artistic gymnastics (MAG). Twelve female and 8 male artistic gymnasts (ages 11-18) wore mouthpieces with triaxial accelerometers and gyroscopes to perform a series of gymnastics skills from 5 common skill progression pathways: backward tumbling (floor), bar elements, forward tumbling, and vault-specific skills (Tsukahara and Yurchenko). Data were recorded at 100 Hz for 10-minute intervals and time-synchronized with video recordings. Peak linear acceleration (PLA), peak rotational acceleration (PRA), resultant change in rotational velocity during the maximum rotational acceleration (ΔRV), and peak rotational velocity (PRV) were compared using mixed-effects models. WAG experienced greater PRV during noncontact skills (eg, giant and clear hip). MAG experienced, on average, 1.7 times greater PRA during skills with significantly different PRA between MAG and WAG. MAG tended to have higher kinematic values for PLA, PRA, and ΔRV during contact phases compared with WAG. It is important to understand head kinematics in nonconcussive situations, as postconcussed gymnasts may have lower tolerance to head acceleration events during recovery. Understanding differences in head kinematics between WAG and MAG can help guide sport- and sex-specific injury prevention strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Published
2025-05-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.2024-0162
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in Head Kinematics Experienced by Women’s and Men’s Artistic Gymnasts During Common Skills

Joel D. Stitzel, Nicholas Stewart Pritchard, Justin B. Moore, Garrett Scott Bullock et al.
Journal of Applied Biomechanics
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

Differences in Head Kinematics Experienced by Women’s and Men’s Artistic Gymnasts During Common Skills

Joel D. Stitzel, Nicholas Stewart Pritchard, Justin B. Moore, Garrett Scott Bullock, Christopher M. Miles, Alexandra G. Peluso, David W. Kruse, Jillian E. Urban, Kambrie M. Brandt, Giovanny A. Romero Agudelo
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize differences in head kinematics across similar skills performed by women's (WAG) and men's artistic gymnastics (MAG). Twelve female and 8 male artistic gymnasts (ages 11-18) wore mouthpieces with triaxial accelerometers and gyroscopes to perform a series of gymnastics skills from 5 common skill progression pathways: backward tumbling (floor), bar elements, forward tumbling, and vault-specific skills (Tsukahara and Yurchenko). Data were recorded at 100 Hz for 10-minute intervals and time-synchronized with video recordings. Peak linear acceleration (PLA), peak rotational acceleration (PRA), resultant change in rotational velocity during the maximum rotational acceleration (ΔRV), and peak rotational velocity (PRV) were compared using mixed-effects models. WAG experienced greater PRV during noncontact skills (eg, giant and clear hip). MAG experienced, on average, 1.7 times greater PRA during skills with significantly different PRA between MAG and WAG. MAG tended to have higher kinematic values for PLA, PRA, and ΔRV during contact phases compared with WAG. It is important to understand head kinematics in nonconcussive situations, as postconcussed gymnasts may have lower tolerance to head acceleration events during recovery. Understanding differences in head kinematics between WAG and MAG can help guide sport- and sex-specific injury prevention strategies.

Journal of Applied BiomechanicsVol. 41(4)
Virginia Tech - Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering & Sciences (US), Orthopaedic Specialty Institute (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.